De Laat Antoon, Stappaerts Karel, Papy Sven
Department of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery, School of Dentistry, Oral Pathology and Maxillofacial Surgery, Catholic University Leuven, Capucijnenvoer 7, B-3000 LEUVEN, Belgium.
J Orofac Pain. 2003 Winter;17(1):42-9.
To prospectively evaluate the effectiveness of a treatment regimen comprising counseling and physical therapy in patients with myofascial pain of the masticatory system, and to explore whether the duration of the physical therapy offered (4 vs 6 weeks) would influence the treatment result.
Twenty-six patients were randomly distributed over 2 groups. All patients received reassuring information, advice regarding relaxation of the jaws, avoiding parafunctions, and limited use of the jaws. In addition, a physical therapy program (heat application, massage, ultrasound and muscle stretching) was initiated 2 weeks after the start of the study (group I, receiving 4 weeks of physical therapy) or immediately from the start of the study (group II, receiving 6 weeks of physical therapy). The following parameters were taken at baseline, 2, 4, and 6 weeks: visual analog scale (VAS) scores of present pain; lowest and highest pain over the past period; percentage of pain relief; jaw function assessment by the Mandibular Function Impairment Questionnaire (MFIQ); and pressure pain thresholds (PPTs) of the masseter, temporalis, and thumb muscles. Statistical analysis used a linear mixed model and corrected for multiple testing (Tukey test).
Pain and MFIQ scores decreased while PPTs increased in both groups. Only after 4 and 6 weeks, significant differences were present for the PPT of the masseter in group I (P < .02) and the temporalis in both groups (P < .01). Also, the VAS scores of present (P < .02), minimal (P < .01), and maximal (P < .0001) pain and the MFIQ score (P < .001) improved. After 6 weeks, a mean of 60% pain decrease was reported (P < .0001). There were no significant differences between the groups receiving 4 weeks vs 6 weeks of physical therapy.
A conservative approach involving counseling and physical therapy resulted in significant improvement in parameters of pain and jaw function in patients with myofascial pain. A controlled study will be necessary to elucidate the specific effectiveness of physical therapy over counseling or no treatment.
前瞻性评估包含咨询和物理治疗的治疗方案对咀嚼系统肌筋膜疼痛患者的有效性,并探讨所提供的物理治疗时长(4周与6周)是否会影响治疗结果。
26例患者随机分为2组。所有患者均获得安慰信息、关于放松颌部、避免副功能以及限制颌部使用的建议。此外,在研究开始2周后启动物理治疗方案(热敷、按摩、超声和肌肉拉伸)(第一组,接受4周物理治疗)或从研究开始立即启动(第二组,接受6周物理治疗)。在基线、2周、4周和6周时记录以下参数:当前疼痛的视觉模拟量表(VAS)评分;过去一段时间内的最低和最高疼痛;疼痛缓解百分比;通过下颌功能损害问卷(MFIQ)进行的颌功能评估;以及咬肌、颞肌和拇指肌肉的压痛阈值(PPT)。统计分析采用线性混合模型并进行多重检验校正(Tukey检验)。
两组患者的疼痛和MFIQ评分均降低,而PPT升高。仅在4周和6周后,第一组咬肌的PPT(P < .02)以及两组颞肌的PPT(P < .01)存在显著差异。此外,当前(P < .02)、最小(P < .01)和最大(P < .0001)疼痛的VAS评分以及MFIQ评分(P < .001)均有所改善。6周后,报告平均疼痛减轻60%(P < .0001)。接受4周与6周物理治疗的组间无显著差异。
包含咨询和物理治疗的保守方法可使肌筋膜疼痛患者的疼痛和颌功能参数得到显著改善。有必要进行对照研究以阐明物理治疗相对于咨询或不治疗的具体有效性。