Wang B, Schreiber G B, Glynn S A, Nass C C, Smith J W, Higgins M J, Hutching S T, Wright D J, McEntire R L, Murphy E L
Westat, Rockville, Maryland 20850, USA.
Transfusion. 2003 Jun;43(6):705-12. doi: 10.1046/j.1537-2995.2003.00399.x.
Understanding the donor base, infectious disease prevalence, and donation loss at various blood donation sites will help maximize blood collection efforts and blood availability.
Using donation data collected at five US blood centers, the prevalence of HIV, HTLV, HBsAg, and HCV in first-time whole-blood donations at 10 donation sites was evaluated: military, education, religious, professional, industry, services, community, health care, government, and fixed sites. Donation loss from screening test reactivity at each donation site was also evaluated.
During the study, 1.2 million first-time whole-blood donations were collected. Military and education sites had a low prevalence of all viral markers, except for HBsAg, which was highest at education sites. Variations in viral marker prevalence among donation sites were partially explained by donor demographic differences. Donation loss varied by donation site, ranging from 3.3 percent at education sites to 6.4 percent at industry sites, indicating differential efficiency of blood collection efforts.
Different rates of positive viral test results and donation loss in first-time whole-blood donors were observed at various types of donation sites. This information may be useful in estimating the yield of usable units from specific blood drives and in allocating resources to meet blood center collection goals.
了解不同献血地点的献血者群体、传染病流行情况及献血流失情况,将有助于最大限度地提高采血工作效率和血液供应。
利用在美国五个血液中心收集的献血数据,评估了10个献血地点首次全血捐献中HIV、HTLV、HBsAg和HCV的流行情况,这些地点包括军队、教育机构、宗教场所、专业场所、企业、服务业、社区、医疗保健机构、政府机构及固定场所。同时还评估了每个献血地点因筛查试验反应性导致的献血流失情况。
在研究期间,共收集了120万份首次全血捐献。军队和教育机构场所所有病毒标志物的流行率较低,但教育机构场所的HBsAg流行率最高。献血地点之间病毒标志物流行率的差异部分可由献血者人口统计学差异来解释。献血流失因献血地点而异,从教育机构场所的3.3%到企业场所的6.4%不等,这表明采血工作效率存在差异。
在不同类型的献血地点,首次全血捐献者的病毒检测阳性率和献血流失率各不相同。这些信息可能有助于估计特定献血活动中可用单位的产量,并有助于分配资源以实现血液中心的采血目标。