Schück Otto, Teplan Vladimir, Jabor Antonin, Stollova Milena, Skibova Jelena
Department of Nephrology, Institute for Clinical and Experimental Medicine, Prague, Czech Republic.
Nephron Clin Pract. 2003;93(4):c146-51. doi: 10.1159/000070234.
Cystatin C has an obvious advantage in the recognition of the initial stages of renal impairment. It is questionable whether cystatin C possesses the same benefit in follow-up of pre-dialysis patients. If cystatin C were also a sensitive marker of GFR in pre-dialysis patients, then it could be expected that, for the same degree of a decrease in GFR, the increase in S(cyst) would be higher than in S(cr) because of the significant increase in tubular secretion of creatinine in residual nephrons. The aim of this study was to evaluate whether S(cyst) in patients with GFR <or=40 ml/min/1.73 m(2) provides a more accurate estimate of GFR than S(cr) does.
The study was performed in 67 patients (mean age 41.5 +/- 7.6 years) with chronic renal insufficiency (GFR = 19.8 +/- 9.9 ml/min/1.73 m(2)) caused by various chronic renal diseases (predominantly by chronic glomerulonephritis and chronic interstitial nephritis). GFR was measured by inulin clearance under conditions of stabilized plasma concentrations and water loading. Creatinine clearance and serum cystatin C concentration (using immunonephelometry) were measured at the same time. For statistical evaluation, linear regression analysis, receiver-operating characteristic (ROC) curves analysis and the method of Bland and Altman were used.
A significant correlation (r = 0.813, p < 0.001) was demonstrated between 1/S(cyst) and C(in) as well as between 1/S(cr) and C(in) (r = 0.815, p < 0.001). There were no significant differences between the regression coefficients and the intercepts of regression straight lines characterizing these relationships. ROC curves analysis using the cut-off values for C(in) = 20 ml/min/1.73 m(2) and C(in) = 10 ml/min/ 1.73 m(2) did not show significant differences of corresponding AUC values for S(cyst) and S(cr) although there was a trend for superiority of S(cyst) in comparison with S(cr). The multiples of upper reference values of S(cyst) and S(cr) in examined patients did not differ significantly. There was a highly significant linear correlation between C(in) and C(cr) in pre-dialysis patients (r = 0.921, p < 0.001). The regression coefficient of this relation (1.279) was significantly higher than 1.0 (p < 0.001) and the value of intercept (6.50 ml/min/1.73 m(2)) was significantly higher than zero (p < 0.001). The average of C(cr)/C(in) in patients with C(in) <10 ml/min/1.73 m(2) was 2.11 (+/- 0.29) and 1.72 (+/- 0.35) for those with C(in) 10-20 ml/min/1.73 m(2).
The findings suggest that in patients with advanced chronic renal insufficiency (CRI) for the same decrease in GFR the increase of S(cyst) is not significantly higher than that of S(cr), although the tubular secretion of creatinine is significantly increased. Further studies (especially those focused on nonrenal elimination of cystatin C) are needed to elucidate the lack of difference between changes in S(cyst) and S(cr) in patients with CRI.
胱抑素C在识别肾功能损害的初始阶段具有明显优势。对于透析前患者的随访,胱抑素C是否具有同样的优势尚存在疑问。如果胱抑素C也是透析前患者肾小球滤过率(GFR)的敏感标志物,那么可以预期,对于相同程度的GFR下降,由于残余肾单位中肌酐的肾小管分泌显著增加,血清胱抑素C(S(cyst))的升高将高于血清肌酐(S(cr))。本研究的目的是评估GFR≤40 ml/min/1.73 m²的患者中,S(cyst)是否比S(cr)能更准确地估算GFR。
本研究纳入了67例(平均年龄41.5±7.6岁)由各种慢性肾脏疾病(主要是慢性肾小球肾炎和慢性间质性肾炎)导致慢性肾功能不全(GFR = 19.8±9.9 ml/min/1.73 m²)的患者。在血浆浓度稳定和水负荷条件下,通过菊粉清除率测定GFR。同时测定肌酐清除率和血清胱抑素C浓度(采用免疫比浊法)。采用线性回归分析、受试者工作特征(ROC)曲线分析以及Bland和Altman方法进行统计学评估。
1/S(cyst)与菊粉清除率(C(in))之间以及1/S(cr)与C(in)之间均显示出显著相关性(r = 0.813,p < 0.001;r = 0.815,p < 0.001)。表征这些关系的回归系数和回归直线截距之间无显著差异。使用C(in) = 20 ml/min/1.73 m²和C(in) = 10 ml/min/1.73 m²的临界值进行ROC曲线分析,虽然S(cyst)相比于S(cr)有优势趋势,但S(cyst)和S(cr)相应的曲线下面积(AUC)值未显示出显著差异。所检查患者中S(cyst)和S(cr)的高于参考值上限的倍数无显著差异。透析前患者中C(in)与肌酐清除率(C(cr))之间存在高度显著的线性相关性(r = 0.921,p < 0.001)。该关系的回归系数(1.279)显著高于1.0(p < 0.001),截距值(6.50 ml/min/1.73 m²)显著高于零(p < 0.001)。C(in) <10 ml/min/1.73 m²的患者中C(cr)/C(in)的平均值为2.11(±0.29),C(in)为10 - 20 ml/min/1.73 m²的患者中该值为1.72(±0.35)。
研究结果表明,在晚期慢性肾功能不全(CRI)患者中,对于相同程度的GFR下降,尽管肌酐的肾小管分泌显著增加,但S(cyst)的升高并不显著高于S(cr)。需要进一步研究(尤其是关注胱抑素C非肾脏清除的研究)以阐明CRI患者中S(cyst)和S(cr)变化缺乏差异的原因。