Raffetto Joseph D, Cheung Yeukki, Fisher Jay B, Cantelmo Nancy L, Watkins Michael T, Lamorte Wayne W, Menzoian James O
Department of Surgery, Section of Vascular Surgery D506, One Boston Medical Center Place, Boston, MA 02118-2393, USA.
J Vasc Surg. 2003 Jun;37(6):1150-4. doi: 10.1016/s0741-5214(03)00147-2.
Patients undergoing midline incision for abdominal aortic reconstruction appear to be at greater risk for postoperative incision hernia compared with patients undergoing celiotomy for general surgical procedures. Controversy exists as to whether incidence of abdominal wall hernia and increased risk for incision hernia is higher in patients with abdominal aortic aneurysm (AAA) than in patients operated on because of aortoiliac occlusive disease (AOD). We conducted a prospective multi-institutional study to assess frequency of incision hernia after aortic surgery through a midline laparotomy and of previous abdominal wall hernia.
Patients with AAA (n = 177) or AOD (n = 82) from three major institutions were prospectively enrolled in the study and examined. Data collected included demographic data, cardiopulmonary risk factors, smoking status, history of previous or current abdominal wall hernia (incision, inguinal, umbilical, femoral), previous midline incision, suture type, and postoperative complications. At a minimum of 6 months after laparotomy, patients were evaluated clinically for a new incision hernia. Differences were tested with the unpaired t test, X(2) test, or Fisher exact test, and multiple logistic regression was used to control for confounding variables.
Mean follow-up of the cohort was 32.8 +/- 2.3 months. Rate of abdominal wall hernia and inguinal hernia in patients with AAA versus AOD was 38.4% versus 11% (P =.001) and 23.7% versus 6.1% (P =.003), respectively. Rate of postoperative incision hernia in patients with AAA was 28.2%, and in patients with AOD was 11.0% (P =.002). Adjusting for age, smoking, chronic obstructive pulmonary disease, body mass index, diabetes, bowel obstruction, and suture type, patients with AAA had almost a ninefold risk for postoperative incision hernia formation (odds ratio [OR], 8.8; P =.0049).
Compared with patients with AOD, patients with AAA have a higher frequency of abdominal wall hernia and inguinal hernia, and are at significant increased risk for development of incision hernia postoperatively. The higher frequency of hernia formation in patients with AAA suggests the presence of a structural defect within the fascia. Further studies are needed to delineate the molecular changes of the aorta and its relation to the abdominal wall fascia.
与接受普通外科剖腹手术的患者相比,接受腹主动脉重建术的中线切口患者术后切口疝的风险似乎更高。腹主动脉瘤(AAA)患者腹壁疝的发生率和切口疝的风险增加是否高于因主髂动脉闭塞性疾病(AOD)接受手术的患者,目前仍存在争议。我们进行了一项前瞻性多机构研究,以评估经中线剖腹术后主动脉手术切口疝的发生率以及既往腹壁疝的情况。
来自三个主要机构的AAA患者(n = 177)或AOD患者(n = 82)被前瞻性纳入研究并接受检查。收集的数据包括人口统计学数据、心肺危险因素、吸烟状况、既往或当前腹壁疝(切口疝、腹股沟疝、脐疝、股疝)病史、既往中线切口、缝合类型和术后并发症。剖腹术后至少6个月,对患者进行临床评估,以确定是否出现新的切口疝。采用不成对t检验、X²检验或Fisher精确检验进行差异检验,并使用多因素逻辑回归分析来控制混杂变量。
该队列的平均随访时间为32.8±2.3个月。AAA患者与AOD患者的腹壁疝和腹股沟疝发生率分别为38.4%对11%(P = 0.001)和23.7%对6.1%(P = 0.003)。AAA患者术后切口疝的发生率为28.2%,AOD患者为11.0%(P = 0.002)。在调整年龄、吸烟、慢性阻塞性肺疾病、体重指数、糖尿病、肠梗阻和缝合类型后,AAA患者术后切口疝形成的风险几乎高出九倍(优势比[OR],8.8;P = 0.0049)。
与AOD患者相比,AAA患者腹壁疝和腹股沟疝的发生率更高,术后发生切口疝的风险显著增加。AAA患者疝形成频率较高表明筋膜内存在结构缺陷。需要进一步研究来阐明主动脉的分子变化及其与腹壁筋膜的关系。