Hay Michael P, Atwell Graham J, Wilson William R, Pullen Susan M, Denny William A
Auckland Cancer Society Research Laboratory, Faculty of Medical and Health Science, The University of Auckland, Private Bag 92019, New Zealand.
J Med Chem. 2003 Jun 5;46(12):2456-66. doi: 10.1021/jm0205191.
Twelve substituted 4-nitrobenzyl carbamate prodrugs of the 5-aminobenz[e]indoline class of DNA minor groove alkylating agents were prepared and tested as prodrugs for gene-directed enzyme prodrug therapy (GDEPT) using a two-electron nitroreductase (NTR) from E. coli B. The prodrugs and effectors were tested in a cell line panel comprising parental and transfected human (SKOV/Skov-NTR(neo), WiDr/WiDr-NTR(neo)), Chinese hamster (V79(puro)/V79-NTR(puro)), and murine (EMT6/EMT6-NTR(puro)) cell line pairs. In the human cell line pairs, several analogues bearing neutral methoxyethoxy-, 2-hydroxyethoxy-, or 3-hydroxypropoxy-substituted side chains were good substrates for NTR as measured by cytotoxicity ratios, with NTR-ve/NTR+ve ratios similar to the established NTR substrates CB1954 (an aziridinyl dinitrobenzamide) and the analogous bromomustard. Selectivity for NTR decreased with increasing side-chain size or the presence of a basic amine group. Low to modest selectivity was observed in the Chinese hamster-derived cell line pair; however, in the murine EMT6/EMT6-NTR(puro) cell line pair, the above hydroxyalkoxy analogues again showed significant selectivity for NTR. The activity of the 2-hydroxyethoxy analogue was evaluated against NTR-expressing EMT6 tumors comprising ca. 10% NTR+ve cells at the time of tumor treatment. A small decrease in NTR+ve cells was observed after treatment, with a lesser effect against NTR-ve target cells, but these effects were not statistically significant and were much less than for the dinitrobenzamides. These results suggest that useful GDEPT prodrugs based on the 4-nitrobenzyl carbamate and 5-aminobenz[e]indoline motifs may be developed if optimization of pharmacokinetics can be addressed.
制备了12种5-氨基苯并[e]吲哚类DNA小沟烷基化剂的取代4-硝基苄基氨基甲酸酯前药,并将其作为前药用于基因导向酶前药疗法(GDEPT),使用来自大肠杆菌B的双电子硝基还原酶(NTR)进行测试。在前药和效应物在一组细胞系中进行了测试,该细胞系包括亲本和转染的人(SKOV/Skov-NTR(neo)、WiDr/WiDr-NTR(neo))、中国仓鼠(V79(puro)/V79-NTR(puro))和小鼠(EMT6/EMT6-NTR(puro))细胞系对。在人细胞系对中,通过细胞毒性比率测量,几种带有中性甲氧基乙氧基、2-羟基乙氧基或3-羟基丙氧基取代侧链的类似物是NTR的良好底物,NTR-ve/NTR+ve比率与已确立的NTR底物CB1954(一种氮丙啶基二硝基苯甲酰胺)和类似的溴化芥子气相似。随着侧链尺寸的增加或碱性胺基的存在,对NTR的选择性降低。在中国仓鼠来源的细胞系对中观察到低至中等的选择性;然而,在小鼠EMT6/EMT6-NTR(puro)细胞系对中,上述羟基烷氧基类似物再次显示出对NTR的显著选择性。评估了2-羟基乙氧基类似物对表达NTR的EMT6肿瘤的活性,在肿瘤治疗时该肿瘤约含10%的NTR+ve细胞。治疗后观察到NTR+ve细胞略有减少,对NTR-ve靶细胞的影响较小,但这些影响无统计学意义,且远小于二硝基苯甲酰胺的影响。这些结果表明,如果能够解决药代动力学的优化问题,基于4-硝基苄基氨基甲酸酯和5-氨基苯并[e]吲哚基序的有用的GDEPT前药可能会被开发出来。