重温摩尔案：国家资助的生物技术研究与征收条款 - Suppr

Suppr

超能文献

Moore revisited: state-sponsored biotechnological research and the takings clause.

作者信息

Orlando M

机构信息

UCLA School of Law, USA.

出版信息

Whittier Law Rev. 2001 Winter;23(2):437-65.

PMID:12774777

Abstract

摘要

相似文献

Moore revisited: state-sponsored biotechnological research and the takings clause.

Whittier Law Rev. 2001 Winter;23(2):437-65.

Proprietary rights in body parts: the relevance of Moore's case in Australia.

Monash Univ Law Rev. 1993;19(1):217-25.

Taking the least of you: most of us have tissue or blood samples on file somewhere, whether we know it or not. What we don't typically know is what research they are being used for or how much money is being made from them. And science may want to keep things that way.

N Y Times Mag. 2006 Apr 16:38-45, 75, 79, 81.

Commercial tissue repositories: HIPAA raises sponsors' fears.

IRB. 2004 Sep-Oct;26(5):9-11.

Toward a just model of alienability of human tissue.

Univ San Francisco Law Rev. 2003 Spring;37(3):757-82.

Patient autonomy and biomedical research: judicial compromise in Moore v. Regents of the University of California.

Albany Law J Sci Technol. 1991;1:277-305.

Moore v. Regents of the University of California: patients, property rights, and public policy.

St Louis Univ Law J. 1991 Winter;35(2):433-62.

Biotechnology: a challenge for Hippocrates.

Auckl Univ Law Rev. 1991;6(4):534-51.

Moore 10 years later--still trying to fill the gap: creating a personal property right in genetic material.

New Engl Law Rev. 1998 Summer;32(4):1131-91.

So what are we going to do about research using clinical information and samples?

IRB. 2004 Nov-Dec;26(6):14-5.

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述，助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型，支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验

Moore revisited: state-sponsored biotechnological research and the takings clause.

作者信息

Orlando M

机构信息

UCLA School of Law, USA.

出版信息

Whittier Law Rev. 2001 Winter;23(2):437-65.

PMID:12774777

Abstract

摘要