Hofherr Louise K, Francis Diane P, Astles J Rex, Schalla William O
Laboratory Assurance Program, Graduate School of Public Health, San Diego State University, San Diego, CA 92120, USA.
Clin Lab Sci. 2002 Fall;15(4):213-9.
To identify and to describe the genotyping and the phenotyping testing practices of U.S. laboratories performing patient HIV-1 antiretroviral resistance testing.
A self-report 44-item mailed questionnaire.
Laboratories potentially performing HIV-1 antiretroviral resistance testing.
Descriptive study.
Of 236 laboratories surveyed, 165 (69.9%) returned completed surveys, but only 23 performed HIV-1 antiretroviral resistance testing. Most were university hospitals (47.8%) or independent laboratories (26.1%). All 23 laboratories used genotypic methods, while nine (39.1%) used both genotyping and phenotyping. Most testing was used for clinical trials or laboratory research. The amount of patient information collected by laboratories varied, as did their type of quality assurance measures. Variation was found with regard to: testing volume, testing experience, testing reasons, testing methods availability, testing controls, specimen treatment, and storage stability.
Due to variation in practices in this area of patient testing, it may be advantageous for laboratory professionals to reach a consensus on what is the most acceptable.
识别并描述美国进行患者HIV-1抗逆转录病毒耐药性检测的实验室的基因分型和表型检测实践。
一份包含44个条目的邮寄自填式问卷。
可能进行HIV-1抗逆转录病毒耐药性检测的实验室。
描述性研究。
在接受调查的236家实验室中,165家(69.9%)返回了完整的调查问卷,但只有23家进行HIV-1抗逆转录病毒耐药性检测。大多数是大学医院(47.8%)或独立实验室(26.1%)。所有23家实验室都使用基因分型方法,而9家(39.1%)同时使用基因分型和表型检测。大多数检测用于临床试验或实验室研究。实验室收集的患者信息量各不相同,其质量保证措施类型也不同。在检测量、检测经验、检测原因、检测方法可用性、检测对照、样本处理和储存稳定性方面存在差异。
由于该患者检测领域实践的差异,实验室专业人员就最可接受的做法达成共识可能是有益的。