Cody Dean E
Health Sciences Center Library, Saint Louis University, USA.
Am J Bioeth. 2002 Fall;2(4):W22.
The recent closure and removal of BioethicsLine led many researchers to wonder where to turn for their research needs. Joyce Plaza wrote that the closure is a mistake. In this essay I maintain, contra Plaza, that due to its cross-disciplinary nature researchers can find bioethics literature in other databases. In developing the search strategy the researcher needs to consider what the problem is about. If the researcher has a philosophical approach in mind, a wise choice would be to use Philosopher's Index; a legal approach suggests using Academic Universe, Westlaw, Lexis or legal databases freely available through state and federal websites. Further, in so far as the National Library of Medicine is integrating citations in BioethicsLine into the NLM Gateway databases (PubMed and LOCATORplus) I point out suggestions on using the latter databases effectively. There is a wealth of information readily available and researchers have much to learn by trying the alternatives.
生物伦理热线(BioethicsLine)近期的关闭和移除让许多研究人员不知该向何处寻求满足其研究需求的资源。乔伊斯·普拉扎写道,此次关闭是个错误。在本文中,与普拉扎的观点相反,我认为由于生物伦理学的跨学科性质,研究人员可以在其他数据库中找到生物伦理学文献。在制定搜索策略时,研究人员需要考虑问题的核心所在。如果研究人员心中有哲学研究路径,明智的选择是使用《哲学家索引》(Philosopher's Index);若是法律研究路径,则建议使用《学术大全》(Academic Universe)、Westlaw、Lexis或通过州和联邦网站免费获取的法律数据库。此外,鉴于美国国立医学图书馆正在将生物伦理热线中的文献引用整合到NLM网关数据库(PubMed和LOCATORplus)中,我指出了有效使用后一种数据库的建议。有大量信息随时可供获取,研究人员通过尝试其他途径能学到很多东西。