O'Brien Stephen G, Deininger Michael W N
School of Clinical and Laboratory Sciences, The Medical School, University of Newcastle, Newcastle, UK.
Semin Hematol. 2003 Apr;40(2 Suppl 2):26-30. doi: 10.1053/shem.2003.50058.
The International Randomized Study of Interferon and STI571 (IRIS) study prospectively compared imatinib with interferon-alpha/low-dose cytarabine (IFN/LDAC) in 1,106 newly diagnosed patients with Philadelphia chromosome-positive chronic myeloid leukemia (CML). Patients not responding to or intolerant of their assigned treatment were allowed to cross over. At 18 months, the projected probability of achieving a complete cytogenetic response was 76.2% for imatinib and 14.5% for IFN/LDAC, respectively (P <.01). Freedom from progression to accelerated phase or blast crisis was 96.7% for imatinib versus 91.5% for IFN/LDAC (P <.01). At the time of the analysis, 85.7% of imatinib-treated patients continued on first-line therapy, but only 10.8% of patients continued with IFN/LDAC. Most cross-overs to imatinib were due to interferon-intolerance. Overall survival was not different in the two groups at 19 months, reflecting efficient rescue of IFN/LDAC failures with imatinib. Imatinib should now be considered the standard therapy for newly diagnosed patients with CML.
国际干扰素与STI571随机研究(IRIS)前瞻性地比较了伊马替尼与干扰素-α/小剂量阿糖胞苷(IFN/LDAC)在1106例新诊断的费城染色体阳性慢性髓性白血病(CML)患者中的疗效。对分配治疗无反应或不耐受的患者可交叉使用其他治疗。18个月时,伊马替尼组和IFN/LDAC组达到完全细胞遗传学缓解的预计概率分别为76.2%和14.5%(P<0.01)。伊马替尼组进展为加速期或急变期的无进展生存率为96.7%,而IFN/LDAC组为91.5%(P<0.01)。分析时,85.7%接受伊马替尼治疗的患者继续一线治疗,但仅10.8%的患者继续使用IFN/LDAC。大多数交叉使用伊马替尼的患者是因为对干扰素不耐受。两组在19个月时的总生存率无差异,这反映了伊马替尼对IFN/LDAC治疗失败患者的有效挽救作用。伊马替尼现在应被视为新诊断CML患者的标准治疗方法。