Yaman S D, Sahin M, Aydin C
Department of Restorative Dentistry and Endodontics, Faculty of Dentistry, Gazi University, Ankara, Turkey.
J Oral Rehabil. 2003 Jun;30(6):630-41. doi: 10.1046/j.1365-2842.2003.01028.x.
This study investigated the strength characteristics of various composites (Tetric Ceram, Tetric Flow, Prisma AP.H, Synergy Duo Shade, Synergy Compact, and Z 100) and compomers (Compoglass, Compoglass F, Dyract AP, F 2000) that were applied in a Class V cavity of a maxillary central incisor. The study was conducted by using a 3-dimensional finite element approach and in the study ansys package program was used. The tooth model had 294 elements and 420 nodes. The teeth considered were assumed to be subjected to an incisal load of 200 N acting at an angle of 26 degrees with the longitudinal axis of the tooth but the effects of different loading angles and different loads were also analysed. Hence, the loads of 100 and 400 N and the loading angles of 0 degrees representing bruxism and 90 degrees representing a traumatic load were also taken into consideration. The effects of the cavity preparation size were also studied. It was determined that any increase in the loading angle and/or the amount of the load resulted in a proportional increase in the stresses developed in the tooth. Furthermore it was also verified that, as a cavity weakens the tooth structure by creating a discontinuity in an intact tooth, the larger sized cavity preparations inevitably cause larger stresses to be developed in the tooth. Strictly from the mechanical point of view, the stresses developed in the restored teeth were determined to be inversely proportional with the modulus of elasticity of the restorative materials. Therefore within the scope of the study Z 100 was found to be superior to the other materials concerned.
本研究调查了应用于上颌中切牙V类洞的各种复合材料(Tetric Ceram、Tetric Flow、Prisma AP.H、Synergy Duo Shade、Synergy Compact和Z 100)和复合体(Compoglass、Compoglass F、Dyract AP、F 2000)的强度特性。该研究采用三维有限元方法进行,研究中使用了ANSYS软件包程序。牙齿模型有294个单元和420个节点。所考虑的牙齿假定承受一个200 N的切向载荷,该载荷与牙齿纵轴成26度角,但也分析了不同加载角度和不同载荷的影响。因此,还考虑了代表磨牙症的0度加载角度和代表创伤性载荷的90度加载角度以及100 N和400 N的载荷。还研究了窝洞预备尺寸的影响。结果表明,加载角度和/或载荷量的任何增加都会导致牙齿中产生的应力成比例增加。此外,还证实,由于窝洞通过在完整牙齿中造成结构不连续而削弱牙齿结构,较大尺寸的窝洞预备不可避免地会导致牙齿中产生更大的应力。严格从力学角度来看,修复后牙齿中产生的应力与修复材料的弹性模量成反比。因此,在本研究范围内,发现Z 100优于其他相关材料。