Siddall Philip J, McClelland Joan M, Rutkowski Susan B, Cousins Michael J
Pain Management and Research Centre, University of Sydney, Royal North Shore Hospital, Sydney, NSW, 2065, Australia Spinal Injuries Unit, Royal North Shore Hospital, Sydney NSW, Australia.
Pain. 2003 Jun;103(3):249-257. doi: 10.1016/S0304-3959(02)00452-9.
A longitudinal cohort study of 100 people with traumatic spinal cord injury (SCI) was performed to determine the prevalence and severity of different types of pain (musculoskeletal, visceral, neuropathic at-level, neuropathic below-level) at 5 years following SCI. Prospective data on the characteristics of pain up to 6 months following injury had been collected previously and allowed comparisons between the presence of pain at different time points. In addition, we sought to determine the relationship between the presence of pain and physical factors related to the injury such as level of lesion, completeness and clinical SCI syndrome. We also obtained information regarding mood, global self-rated health and the impact of pain on function. Of the 100 subjects in the original cohort, 73 were available for follow up. When all types of pain were included, 59 of the 73 subjects (81%) reported the presence of pain. Musculoskeletal pain was the most common type of pain experienced and was present in 43 subjects (59%), at-level neuropathic pain was present in 30 subjects (41%), below-level neuropathic pain was present in 25 subjects (34%) and visceral pain was present in four subjects (5%). Overall, 58% reported their pain as severe or excruciating and those with visceral pain were most likely to rate their pain in these categories. There was no relationship between the presence of pain overall and level or completeness of lesion, or type of injury. However, tetraplegics were more likely to report below-level neuropathic pain. This study prospectively demonstrates the differing time courses of different types of pain over the first 5 years following SCI. There was a strong correlation between the presence of both types of neuropathic pain at 5 years and earlier time points but both visceral pain and musculoskeletal pain demonstrated a poor correlation between time points. Chronic visceral pain occurs in a small percentage of patients and does not correlate with the presence of visceral pain early following injury. Those with neuropathic pain early following their injury are likely to continue to experience ongoing pain and the pain is likely to be severe. In contrast, chronic musculoskeletal pain is more common but less likely to be severe and cannot be predicted by the presence of pain in the first 6 months following injury.
开展了一项针对100例创伤性脊髓损伤(SCI)患者的纵向队列研究,以确定脊髓损伤后5年时不同类型疼痛(肌肉骨骼性、内脏性、损伤平面的神经性、损伤平面以下的神经性)的患病率及严重程度。此前已收集了损伤后长达6个月的疼痛特征的前瞻性数据,从而能够对不同时间点疼痛的存在情况进行比较。此外,我们试图确定疼痛的存在与损伤相关的身体因素(如损伤平面、损伤完整性和临床脊髓损伤综合征)之间的关系。我们还获取了有关情绪、总体自我评定健康状况以及疼痛对功能影响的信息。在最初队列的100名受试者中,73名可供随访。当纳入所有类型的疼痛时,73名受试者中有59名(81%)报告存在疼痛。肌肉骨骼性疼痛是最常经历的疼痛类型,43名受试者(59%)存在该类型疼痛,损伤平面的神经性疼痛存在于30名受试者(41%)中,损伤平面以下的神经性疼痛存在于25名受试者(34%)中,内脏性疼痛存在于4名受试者(5%)中。总体而言,58%的受试者报告其疼痛为重度或极重度,而患有内脏性疼痛的受试者最有可能将其疼痛归为这些类别。疼痛的总体存在情况与损伤平面、损伤完整性或损伤类型之间没有关系。然而,四肢瘫患者更有可能报告损伤平面以下的神经性疼痛。这项研究前瞻性地证明了脊髓损伤后最初5年中不同类型疼痛的不同时间进程。5年时两种类型的神经性疼痛的存在与早期时间点之间存在很强的相关性,但内脏性疼痛和肌肉骨骼性疼痛在各时间点之间的相关性较差。慢性内脏性疼痛发生于一小部分患者中,且与损伤后早期内脏性疼痛的存在无关。那些在损伤后早期患有神经性疼痛的患者很可能会持续经历疼痛,且疼痛可能很严重。相比之下,慢性肌肉骨骼性疼痛更常见,但不太可能很严重,并且无法通过损伤后最初6个月内疼痛的存在情况来预测。