Howell Lydia Pleotis, Green Ralph, Anders Thomas F
Department of Pathology and Psychiatry, University of California-Davis School of Medicine, Davis, CA 95616, USA.
Hum Pathol. 2003 May;34(5):437-43. doi: 10.1016/s0046-8177(03)00090-x.
We report how data from the University of California (UC) Davis mission-based reporting system (MBR) can be used to define contributions for each division within a Department of Pathology based on faculty rank and series, and to evaluate whether these contributions are in alignment with the missions of the department and the goals of the school's leadership. MBR summary reports were generated for each division within the Department of Pathology; these reports illustrated the average contribution for each faculty rank and series in each of the following missions: investigative/creative work (research), teaching, clinical service, and administrative/community service. All divisions contributed equally to the teaching mission, averaging approximately 1/3 of a faculty member's time. Research was the primary mission for faculty in both the Research and the Clinical Pathology divisions, whereas clinical service was the primary mission for Anatomic Pathology. Both Anatomic Pathology and Clinical Pathology also played a large role in the administration/community service mission. These roles were appropriate based on the division's distribution of faculty in each of the faculty series. The average contribution to both the research and administrative/community service missions were larger for the Department of Pathology than it was for the school as a whole. The Department of Pathology's average contribution to both the teaching and clinical service missions was less than the school's average. We conclude that MBR data creates unique profiles for divisions and the department and enables interdepartmental comparisons that would not be possible by other means. Within the context of our school, the present analysis illustrates that the Department of Pathology is fulfilling the expectations of the school's leadership. In a more general sense, these profiles allow appropriate monitoring of the workforce, funds flow analysis, allocation of resources, and strategic planning in an academic medical center.
我们报告了如何利用来自加利福尼亚大学戴维斯分校基于任务的报告系统(MBR)的数据,根据教员职级和序列来确定病理系内各部门的贡献,并评估这些贡献是否与该系的使命以及学校领导层的目标相一致。为病理系内的每个部门生成了MBR总结报告;这些报告展示了每个教员职级和序列在以下各项任务中的平均贡献:调查/创造性工作(研究)、教学、临床服务以及行政/社区服务。所有部门对教学任务的贡献均等,平均约占教员时间的三分之一。研究是研究病理科和临床病理科教员的主要任务,而临床服务则是解剖病理科的主要任务。解剖病理科和临床病理科在行政/社区服务任务中也发挥了很大作用。基于各部门在每个教员序列中的教员分布情况,这些作用是恰当的。病理系对研究和行政/社区服务任务的平均贡献大于整个学校的平均贡献。病理系对教学和临床服务任务的平均贡献低于学校的平均水平。我们得出结论,MBR数据为各部门和该系创建了独特的概况,并实现了通过其他方式无法进行的部门间比较。在我们学校的背景下,当前分析表明病理系正在履行学校领导层的期望。从更普遍的意义上讲,这些概况有助于在学术医疗中心对劳动力进行适当监测、资金流分析、资源分配以及战略规划。