Suppr超能文献

对三家教学医院外科医生报告的错误进行分析。

Analysis of errors reported by surgeons at three teaching hospitals.

作者信息

Gawande Atul A, Zinner Michael J, Studdert David M, Brennan Troyen A

机构信息

Brigham and Women's Hospital and Harvard School of Public Health, Boston, MA 02155, USA.

出版信息

Surgery. 2003 Jun;133(6):614-21. doi: 10.1067/msy.2003.169.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

Little is known of the factors that underlie surgical errors. Incident reporting has been proposed as a method of obtaining information about medical errors to help identify such factors.

METHODS

Between November 1, 2000, and March 15, 2001, we conducted confidential interviews with randomly selected surgeons from three Massachusetts teaching hospitals to elicit detailed reports on surgical adverse events resulting from errors in management ("incidents"). Data on the characteristics of the incidents and the factors that surgeons reported to have contributed to the errors were recorded and analyzed.

RESULTS

Among 45 surgeons approached for interviews, 38 (84%) agreed to participate and provided reports on 146 incidents. Thirty-three percent of incidents resulted in permanent disability and 13% in patient death. Seventy-seven percent involved injuries related to an operation or other invasive intervention (visceral injuries, bleeding, and wound infection/dehiscence were the most common subtypes), 13% involved unnecessary or inappropriate procedures, and 10% involved unnecessary advancement of disease. Two thirds of the incidents involved errors during the intraoperative phase of surgical care, 27% during preoperative management, and 22% during postoperative management. Two or more clinicians were cited as substantially contributing to errors in 70% of the incidents. The most commonly cited systems factors contributing to errors were inexperience/lack of competence in a surgical task (53% of incidents), communication breakdowns among personnel (43%), and fatigue or excessive workload (33%). Surgeons reported significantly more systems failures in incidents involving emergency surgical care than those involving nonemergency care (P <.001).

CONCLUSIONS

Subjective incident reports gathered through interviews allow identification of characteristics of surgical errors and their leading contributing factors, which may help target research and interventions to reduce such errors.

摘要

背景

手术失误背后的因素鲜为人知。事件报告已被提议作为获取医疗失误信息以帮助识别此类因素的一种方法。

方法

在2000年11月1日至2001年3月15日期间,我们对从马萨诸塞州的三家教学医院中随机挑选的外科医生进行了保密访谈,以获取有关因管理失误导致的手术不良事件(“事件”)的详细报告。记录并分析了事件特征以及外科医生报告的导致失误的因素的数据。

结果

在45名接受访谈邀请的外科医生中,38名(84%)同意参与并提供了146起事件的报告。33%的事件导致永久性残疾,13%导致患者死亡。77%的事件涉及与手术或其他侵入性干预相关的伤害(内脏损伤、出血和伤口感染/裂开是最常见的亚型),13%涉及不必要或不适当的手术,10%涉及疾病的不必要进展。三分之二的事件涉及手术护理术中阶段的失误,27%涉及术前管理失误,22%涉及术后管理失误。在70%的事件中,有两名或更多临床医生被认为对失误有重大促成作用。导致失误的最常被提及的系统因素是手术任务经验不足/能力欠缺(53%的事件)、人员之间的沟通故障(43%)以及疲劳或工作量过大(33%)。外科医生报告称,与非急诊护理相关的事件相比,急诊手术护理相关事件中的系统故障明显更多(P<.001)。

结论

通过访谈收集的主观事件报告能够识别手术失误的特征及其主要促成因素,这可能有助于针对减少此类失误开展研究和采取干预措施。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验