Li Tong, Rhoads George G, Smulian John, Demissie Kitaw, Wartenberg Daniel, Kruse Lakota
Division of Epidemiology, School of Public Health, Robert Wood Johnson Medical School, University of Medicine and Dentistry of New Jersey, New Brunswick, New Jersey 08540, USA.
Obstet Gynecol. 2003 Jun;101(6):1204-12. doi: 10.1016/s0029-7844(03)00175-3.
To compare perinatal outcomes in obstetric practices with high and low cesarean delivery rates.
We conducted a population-based study based on 171295 singleton births in New Jersey in 1996 and 1997. Vital certificate data for each birth were linked to the corresponding hospital discharge records. Nonsubspecialist obstetricians were divided into three groups based on their cesarean delivery rates during the study period: low (less than 18%), medium (18-27%), and high (greater than 27%). Perinatal mortality, rates of birth injury, and uterine rupture were compared among the physician groups after adjustment for differences in patient risks.
Physicians in the frequent cesarean delivery group performed more cesarean deliveries for all major indications. Perinatal mortality rates were comparable among the three physician groups. Low and very low birth weight infants delivered by the high-rate physicians did not have a lower risk of mortality. The risk of intracranial hemorrhage was significantly higher for infants delivered by low-rate physicians than for those delivered by medium-rate physicians (adjusted relative risk [RR] 1.53; 95% confidence interval [CI] 1.07, 2.19). Relative to deliveries by medium-rate physicians, deliveries by low-rate physicians were associated with a lower overall risk of uterine rupture (adjusted RR 0.56; 95% CI 0.34, 0.92). Medium- and high-rate groups had similar occurrences of birth injury and uterine rupture.
Low cesarean delivery rates reduced the rate of uterine rupture and were not associated with increased perinatal mortality. The data suggest a small increase in intracranial hemorrhages in infants delivered by physicians who perform relatively few cesarean deliveries.
比较剖宫产率高和低的产科实践中的围产期结局。
我们基于1996年和1997年新泽西州的171295例单胎分娩进行了一项基于人群的研究。每次分娩的出生证明数据与相应的医院出院记录相关联。非专科产科医生根据他们在研究期间的剖宫产率分为三组:低(低于18%)、中(18%-27%)和高(高于27%)。在对患者风险差异进行调整后,比较医生组之间的围产期死亡率、出生损伤率和子宫破裂情况。
频繁剖宫产组的医生针对所有主要指征进行的剖宫产更多。三个医生组的围产期死亡率相当。高剖宫产率医生接生的低体重和极低体重婴儿的死亡风险并未降低。低剖宫产率医生接生的婴儿发生颅内出血的风险显著高于中剖宫产率医生接生的婴儿(调整后相对风险[RR]为1.53;95%置信区间[CI]为1.07, 2.19)。与中剖宫产率医生接生的情况相比,低剖宫产率医生接生的总体子宫破裂风险较低(调整后RR为0.56;95%CI为0.34, 0.92)。中剖宫产率组和高剖宫产率组的出生损伤和子宫破裂发生率相似。
低剖宫产率降低了子宫破裂率,且与围产期死亡率增加无关。数据表明,剖宫产手术相对较少的医生接生的婴儿颅内出血略有增加。