Goldman Dana P, Berry Sandra H, McCabe Mary S, Kilgore Meredith L, Potosky Arnold L, Schoenbaum Michael L, Schonlau Matthias, Weeks Jane C, Kaplan Richard, Escarce Jose J
RAND Health, 1700 Main St, Santa Monica, CA 90407-2138, USA.
JAMA. 2003 Jun 11;289(22):2970-7. doi: 10.1001/jama.289.22.2970.
Concern about additional costs for direct patient care impedes efforts to enroll patients in clinical trials. But generalizable evidence substantiating these concerns is lacking.
To assess the additional cost of treating cancer patients in the National Cancer Institute (NCI)-sponsored clinical trials in the United States across a range of trial phases, treatment modalities, and patient care settings.
Retrospective cost study using a multistage, stratified, random sample of patients enrolled in 1 of 35 active phase 3 trials or phase 1 or any phase 2 trials between October 1, 1998, and December 31, 1999. Unadjusted and adjusted costs were compared and related to trial phase, institution type, and vital status.
A representative sample of 932 cancer patients enrolled in nonpediatric, NCI-sponsored clinical trials and 696 nonparticipants with a similar stage of disease not enrolled in a research protocol from 83 cancer clinical research institutions across the United States.
Direct treatment costs as measured using a combination of medical records, telephone survey, and Medicare claims data. Administrative and other research costs were excluded.
The incremental costs of direct care in trials were modest. Over approximately a 2.5-year period, adjusted costs were 6.5% higher for trial participants than nonparticipants (35,418 dollars vs 33,248 dollars; P =.11). Cost differences for phase 3 studies were 3.5% (P =.22), lower than for phase 1 or 2 trials (12.8%; P =.20). Trial participants who died had higher costs than nonparticipants who died (17.9%; 39,420 dollars vs 33,432 dollars, respectively; P =.15).
Treatment costs for nonpediatric clinical trial participants are on average 6.5% higher than what they would be if patients did not enroll. This implies total incremental treatment costs for NCI-sponsored trials of 16 million dollars in 1999. Incremental costs were higher for patients who died and who were in early phase studies although these findings deserve further scrutiny. Overall, the additional treatment costs of an open reimbursement policy for government-sponsored cancer clinical trials appear minimal.
对直接患者护理额外费用的担忧阻碍了将患者纳入临床试验的努力。但缺乏证实这些担忧的普遍适用证据。
评估在美国国立癌症研究所(NCI)赞助的临床试验中,治疗癌症患者在一系列试验阶段、治疗方式和患者护理环境下的额外费用。
回顾性成本研究,使用多阶段、分层、随机抽样的患者样本,这些患者参加了1998年10月1日至1999年12月31日期间35项活跃的3期试验、1期或任何2期试验中的一项。比较了未调整和调整后的成本,并与试验阶段、机构类型和生命状态相关联。
来自美国83家癌症临床研究机构的932名参加非儿科、NCI赞助临床试验的癌症患者和696名未参加研究方案但疾病阶段相似的非参与者的代表性样本。
使用病历、电话调查和医疗保险索赔数据相结合的方式测量直接治疗成本。排除行政和其他研究成本。
试验中直接护理的增量成本适中。在大约2.5年的时间里,试验参与者的调整后成本比非参与者高6.5%(35,418美元对33,248美元;P = 0.11)。3期研究的成本差异为3.5%(P = 0.22),低于1期或2期试验(12.8%;P = 0.20)。死亡的试验参与者比死亡的非参与者成本更高(17.9%;分别为39,420美元对33,432美元;P = 0.15)。
非儿科临床试验参与者的治疗成本平均比患者不参加时高出6.5%。这意味着1999年NCI赞助试验的总增量治疗成本为1600万美元。死亡患者和早期研究患者的增量成本更高,尽管这些发现值得进一步审查。总体而言,政府赞助的癌症临床试验开放报销政策的额外治疗成本似乎最小。