Gibson P G, Henry R L, Coughlan J L
Department of Respiratory and Sleep Medicine, John Hunter Hospital, Locked Bag 1, Hunter Mail Centre, NSW, Australia.
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2003(2):CD001496. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD001496.
Asthma and gastro-oesophageal reflux are both common medical conditions and often co-exist. Studies have shown conflicting results concerning the effects of lower oesophageal acidification as a trigger of asthma. Furthermore, asthma might precipitate gastro-oesophageal reflux. Thus a temporal association between the two does not establish that gastro-oesophageal reflux triggers asthma. Randomised trials of a number of treatments for gastro-oesophageal reflux in asthma have been conducted to determine whether treatment of reflux improves asthma.
The objective of this review was to evaluate the effectiveness of treatments for gastro-oesophageal reflux in terms of their benefit on asthma.
The Cochrane Airways Group trials register, review articles and reference lists of articles were searched.
Randomised controlled trials of treatment for oesophageal reflux in adults and children with a diagnosis of both asthma and gastro-oesophageal reflux.
Trial quality and data extraction were carried out by two independent reviewers. Authors were contacted for confirmation or more data.
Twelve trials met the inclusion criteria. Interventions included proton pump inhibitors (n=6), histamine antagonists (n=5), surgery (n=1) and conservative management (n=1). Treatment duration ranged from 1 week to 6 months. A temporal association between asthma and gastro-oesophageal reflux was investigated in 4 trials and found to be present in a proportion of participants in these trials. Anti-reflux treatment did not consistently improve lung function, asthma symptoms, nocturnal asthma or the use of asthma medications.
REVIEWER'S CONCLUSIONS: In asthmatic subjects with gastro-oesophageal reflux, (but who were not recruited specifically on the basis of reflux-associated respiratory symptoms), there was no overall improvement in asthma following treatment for gastro-oesophageal reflux. Subgroups of patients may gain benefit, but it appears difficult to predict responders.
哮喘和胃食管反流都是常见的病症,且常常并存。关于食管下段酸化作为哮喘触发因素的影响,研究结果相互矛盾。此外,哮喘可能会促使胃食管反流发生。因此,两者之间的时间关联并不能确定胃食管反流会引发哮喘。已经开展了多项针对哮喘患者胃食管反流的治疗的随机试验,以确定反流治疗是否能改善哮喘。
本综述的目的是评估胃食管反流治疗对哮喘的疗效。
检索了Cochrane气道组试验注册库、综述文章以及文章的参考文献列表。
针对同时诊断为哮喘和胃食管反流的成人及儿童的食管反流治疗的随机对照试验。
由两名独立的审阅者进行试验质量评估和数据提取。与作者联系以确认或获取更多数据。
12项试验符合纳入标准。干预措施包括质子泵抑制剂(n = 6)、组胺拮抗剂(n = 5)、手术(n = 1)和保守治疗(n = 1)。治疗持续时间从1周至6个月不等。4项试验研究了哮喘与胃食管反流之间的时间关联,发现部分参与者存在这种关联。抗反流治疗并未持续改善肺功能、哮喘症状、夜间哮喘或哮喘药物的使用情况。
在患有胃食管反流的哮喘患者中(但并非专门基于反流相关的呼吸道症状招募),胃食管反流治疗后哮喘并未整体改善。部分患者亚组可能会获益,但似乎难以预测哪些患者会有反应。