Gerosa G, Mazzali C, Ballarin-Denti A
University of Milan, Dept. of Plant Production, via Celoria 2, 20133 Milano, Italy.
ScientificWorldJournal. 2001 Oct 31;1:612-26. doi: 10.1100/tsw.2001.84.
Ozone is the most harmful air pollutant for plant ecosystems in the Mediterranean and Alpine areas due to its biological and economic damage to crops and forests. In order to evaluate the relation between ozone exposure and vegetation injury under on-field conditions, suitable ozone monitoring techniques were investigated. In the framework of a 5-year research project aimed at ozone risk assessment on forests, both continuous analysers and passive samplers were employed during the summer seasons (1994-1998) in different sites of a wide mountain region (80 x 40 km2) on the southern slope of the European Alps. Continuous analysers allowed the recording of ozone hourly concentration means necessary both to calculate specific exposure indexes (such as AOT, SUM, W126) and to record daily time-courses. Passive samplers, even though supplied only weekly mean concentration values, made it possible to estimate the altitude concentration gradient useful to correct the altitude dependence of ozone concentrations to be inserted into exposure indexes. In-canopy ozone profiles were also determined by placing passive samplers at different heights inside the forest canopy. Vertical ozone soundings by means of tethered balloons (kytoons) allowed the measurement of the vertical concentration gradient above the forest canopy. They also revealed ozone reservoirs aloft and were useful to explain the ozone advection dynamic in mountain slopes where ground measurement proved to be inadequate. An intercomparison between passive (PASSAM, CH) and continuous measurements highlighted the necessity to accurately standardize all the exposure operations, particularly the pre- and postexposure conservation at cold temperature to avoid dye (DPE) activity. Advantages and disadvantages from each mentioned technique are discussed.
由于臭氧对农作物和森林造成生物和经济损害,它是地中海和阿尔卑斯地区对植物生态系统最有害的空气污染物。为了评估田间条件下臭氧暴露与植被损伤之间的关系,对合适的臭氧监测技术进行了研究。在一个为期5年的旨在评估森林臭氧风险的研究项目框架内,1994 - 1998年夏季期间,在欧洲阿尔卑斯山南坡一个广阔山区(80×40平方公里)的不同地点,同时使用了连续分析仪和被动采样器。连续分析仪能够记录每小时臭氧浓度平均值,这对于计算特定暴露指数(如AOT、SUM、W126)以及记录每日时间进程都是必要的。被动采样器尽管仅提供每周平均浓度值,但能够估算海拔浓度梯度,这对于校正要纳入暴露指数的臭氧浓度的海拔依赖性很有用。通过将被动采样器放置在森林冠层内不同高度来确定冠层内臭氧剖面。借助系留气球(气象探测气球)进行的垂直臭氧探测能够测量森林冠层上方的垂直浓度梯度。它们还揭示了高空的臭氧储存库,有助于解释在地面测量证明不足的山坡上的臭氧平流动态。被动测量(PASSAM,CH)与连续测量之间的比对突出了准确规范所有暴露操作的必要性,特别是在低温下暴露前和暴露后的保存,以避免染料(DPE)活性。讨论了上述每种技术的优缺点。