Comparative cardiovascular actions of clentiazem, diltiazem, verapamil, nifedipine, and nimodipine in isolated rabbit tissues.

Clentiazem is an 8-chloro-substituted derivative of diltiazem. We compared the relative potency of clentiazem with that of diltiazem, verapamil, nifedipine, and nimodipine in isolated rabbit right atria and vascular smooth muscle removed from various arterial beds. In experiments with isolated right atria, calcium channel blockers were added cumulatively to study relative cardiodepressive potencies (as compared with vascular effects) with the following results: verapamil greater than or equal to diltiazem greater than clentiazem greater than or equal to nimodipine much greater than nifedipine. The aorta, pulmonary, renal, mesenteric, coronary, and basilar arteries were removed, cut helically in strips, and mounted in isolated tissue baths to measure isometric force. Vessels were contracted with either 40 mM KCl (opening voltage-operated calcium channels) or 1 x 10(-5) M norepinephrine (NE, opening receptor-operated calcium channels). Cumulative dose-response curves were generated for relaxation with each calcium channel blocker. All compounds were more potent at relaxing potassium-induced contractions than NE-induced contractions. In vessels precontracted with KCl, neither diltiazem, verapamil, or nifedipine showed selectivity for basilar artery as compared with the mesenteric artery. Both clentiazem and nimodipine were selective (6- and 30-fold, respectively) for basilar artery in blocking potassium-induced contractions. When NE was used to contract the arteries, clentiazem (12-fold), diltiazem (8-fold), verapamil (8-fold), and nifedipine (153-fold) were all more potent in relaxing the contraction in basilar artery than in mesenteric artery. Nimodipine failed to demonstrate selectivity for basilar artery as compared with mesenteric artery contracted with NE.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)