McNabney Matthew K, Andersen Ross E, Bennett Richard G
Division of Geriatric Medicine and Gerontology, The Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, Maryland, USA.
J Am Med Dir Assoc. 2002 Jul-Aug;3(4):246-50. doi: 10.1097/01.JAM.0000021168.82435.C0.
To describe physician telephone management of newly admitted nursing home residents before direct evaluation by the physician, and the effect on resident outcomes.
Retrospective chart review of 111 consecutive discharge records from two proprietary community nursing homes in Baltimore, Maryland in 1999.
Data regarding the admission process were collected, with an emphasis on physician telephone orders at admission and all subsequent telephone orders before the first physician visit. Physicians were categorized as attending physicians or on-call physicians. Unexpected outcomes defined as an unplanned admission to an acute hospital or an unanticipated death within 14 days of admission to the nursing home were identified. The relationships among resident, physician, and admission characteristics and unexpected outcomes were analyzed.
Most residents (97 of 111 (87%)) were admitted from an acute hospital, and the remaining 13% were admitted from home or another nursing home. An attending physician confirmed admission orders for 87 of 111 (78%) residents, and an on-call physician confirmed admission orders for the remainder. Physicians changed medications at the time of admission, as compared with preadmission medications, in 58 of 111 (52%) residents and ordered laboratory studies or radiographs in 59 of 111 (53%). On-call physicians were just as likely to make both types of changes as attending physicians. In the time interval after the initial telephone contact but before the first physician visit, medication changes were made in 35 of 111 (32%) residents and testing was ordered in 16 of 111 (14%). Nineteen of 111 (17%) residents were either readmitted to the hospital or died within 14 days of admission to the nursing home. These unexpected outcomes were statistically less likely to occur in the group of residents for whom physicians made medication changes at the time of admission as compared to the group for whom no medication changes were made [6 of 58 (10%) versus 13 of 53 (25%), P = 0.04, respectively], and in the group for whom tests were ordered at the time of admission as compared to not ordered [4 of 59 (7%) versus 15 of 51 (29%), P = 0.002, respectively]. There were no differences in the likelihood of unexpected outcomes when physicians made medication changes or ordered tests after the time of admission but before the first physician visit.
In this study, physicians made adjustments in medications and ordered tests for newly admitted nursing home patients before seeing the resident in the majority of cases. Unexpected outcomes including readmission to the hospital or death within 14 days of admission were less common among those residents when such changes were made at the time of admission. Further studies are needed to identify those changes as well as those resident and physician characteristics that might lead to improved outcomes.
描述医生在直接评估新入住养老院居民之前通过电话进行的管理,以及对居民结局的影响。
对1999年马里兰州巴尔的摩市两家私立社区养老院连续111份出院记录进行回顾性图表审查。
收集有关入院过程的数据,重点是入院时医生的电话医嘱以及首次医生查房前所有后续的电话医嘱。医生分为主治医生或值班医生。确定意外结局,定义为在入住养老院后14天内意外入住急性医院或意外死亡。分析居民、医生和入院特征与意外结局之间的关系。
大多数居民(111例中的97例(87%))从急性医院入院,其余13%从家中或另一家养老院入院。111例居民中有87例(78%)的入院医嘱由主治医生确认,其余由值班医生确认。与入院前用药相比,111例居民中有58例(52%)在入院时医生更改了用药,111例中有59例(53%)医生开具了实验室检查或X光检查医嘱。值班医生进行这两种更改的可能性与主治医生相同。在首次电话联系后但首次医生查房前的时间段内,111例居民中有35例(32%)更改了用药,111例中有16例(14%)开具了检查医嘱。111例居民中有19例(17%)在入住养老院后14天内再次入院或死亡。与未更改用药的居民组相比,入院时医生更改用药的居民组中这些意外结局在统计学上不太可能发生[58例中的6例(10%)对53例中的13例(25%),P = 0.04],与未开具检查医嘱的居民组相比,入院时开具检查医嘱的居民组中意外结局发生的可能性较小[59例中的4例(7%)对51例中的15例(29%),P = 0.002]。在入院后但首次医生查房前医生更改用药或开具检查医嘱时,意外结局发生的可能性没有差异。
在本研究中,大多数情况下医生在见到新入住养老院的患者之前就对其用药进行了调整并开具了检查医嘱。对于那些在入院时进行了此类更改的居民,包括入院后14天内再次入院或死亡在内的意外结局较少见。需要进一步研究以确定这些更改以及可能导致改善结局的居民和医生特征。