Barr Judith, Schumacher Gerald
School of Pharmacy, National Education and Research Center for Outcomes Assessment, Bouve College of Health Sciences, Northeastern University, Boston, MA 02115, USA.
J Am Diet Assoc. 2003 Jul;103(7):844-51. doi: 10.1016/s0002-8223(03)00385-7.
As the first part of a multiphase process to develop a Nutrition Quality of Life (NQOL) survey, our objective was to identify items that later will be psychometrically evaluated for inclusion into the NQOL survey, a survey that can be used in routine practice to monitor the impact of medical nutrition therapy (MNT).
We used a prospective, six-step iterative process involving focus groups, surveys, and consensus processes to build a conceptual framework to describe health-related quality of life in individuals receiving MNT, to identify items for inclusion in an NQOL survey, and to refine these items and the survey format. Subjects/Setting and Methods Items were generated from 65 patients in five geographically diverse locations participating in 10 focus groups and 46 dietitians in the same geographic locations participating in seven focus groups. Patients represented a variety of ages, ethnicities, and clinical and economic conditions. Dietitians were primarily from outpatient locations with both general and speciality practices. Sixty-one percent of the participants provided feedback via mailed surveys. Additional input was received from audience attendees at sessions at two national nutrition meetings.
Based on comments generated in client and dietitian focus groups, we identified 50 items in six clusters: 9 items in food impact; 6, self-image; 10, psychological factors; 7, social/interpersonal; 9, physical; and 9, self-efficacy. Whenever possible, we developed items using the clients' own words. Clients, responding to the mailed survey, indicated that they took approximately 10 minutes to complete the NQOL survey. Applications/Conclusions At this time, dietitians may use the 50 questions to probe the impact of MNT on their clients' NQOL. However, psychometric and clinical testing will be necessary to further refine these items before the NQOL survey can be scored and used to measure the NQOL of patients at baseline, to monitor the impact of MNT over time, and to manage future MNT interventions by using an NQOL survey in a quality improvement program.
作为制定营养生活质量(NQOL)调查问卷多阶段流程的第一部分,我们的目标是确定一些条目,这些条目随后将接受心理测量学评估,以纳入NQOL调查问卷,该调查问卷可用于日常实践中监测医学营养治疗(MNT)的效果。
我们采用了一个前瞻性的六步迭代流程,包括焦点小组、调查和共识流程,以构建一个概念框架,描述接受MNT的个体的健康相关生活质量,确定纳入NQOL调查问卷的条目,并完善这些条目和调查问卷格式。受试者/地点和方法条目来自五个地理位置不同地点的65名患者,他们参加了10个焦点小组,以及同一地理位置的46名营养师,他们参加了7个焦点小组。患者代表了不同的年龄、种族以及临床和经济状况。营养师主要来自具有普通和专科业务的门诊地点。61%的参与者通过邮寄调查问卷提供了反馈。在两次全国营养会议的会议上,还从与会观众那里获得了额外的意见。
根据客户和营养师焦点小组提出的意见,我们确定了50个条目,分为六个类别:食物影响方面9个条目;自我形象方面6个条目;心理因素方面10个条目;社会/人际关系方面7个条目;身体方面9个条目;自我效能方面9个条目。只要有可能,我们就使用客户自己的话来制定条目。回复邮寄调查问卷的客户表示,他们完成NQOL调查问卷大约需要10分钟。应用/结论目前,营养师可以使用这50个问题来探究MNT对其客户NQOL的影响。然而,在NQOL调查问卷能够计分并用于在基线时测量患者的NQOL、监测MNT随时间的效果以及通过在质量改进计划中使用NQOL调查问卷来管理未来的MNT干预措施之前,还需要进行心理测量学和临床测试,以进一步完善这些条目。