Casalino Lawrence, Robinson James C
Department of Health Studies, University of Chicago, Chicago, IL 60637, USA.
Milbank Q. 2003;81(2):331-51, 173-4. doi: 10.1111/1468-0009.t01-2-00056.
Using concepts from organizational economics and sociology, this article compares the medical staff, hospital-owned physician practice, and hybrid models of hospital-physician coordination, as well as the pressures for affiliation during the premanaged care, tight managed care, and loose managed care eras. Case studies of two hospital systems in New York City and two in San Diego illustrate the concepts. Although pressures for tighter hospital-physician affiliation now are weaker than during the era of tight managed care, they are greater than they were before managed care. Hospitals are not reverting to exclusive use of the medical staff model of affiliation but rather are maintaining a mix of medical staff, owned physician practice, and hybrid models. Hospitals probably will continue to seek tighter affiliations with physicians to increase coordination, enhance negotiating leverage with health plans, and gain admissions.
本文运用组织经济学和社会学的概念,比较了医务人员模式、医院拥有的医师执业模式以及医院与医师协调的混合模式,以及在预管理式医疗、严格管理式医疗和宽松管理式医疗时代的联合压力。纽约市两个医院系统和圣地亚哥两个医院系统的案例研究阐释了这些概念。尽管如今医院与医师加强联合的压力比严格管理式医疗时代要弱,但比管理式医疗出现之前要大。医院并非只恢复使用医务人员联合模式,而是维持医务人员模式、医院拥有的医师执业模式和混合模式的组合。医院可能会继续寻求与医师建立更紧密的联合,以加强协调、增强与医疗计划的谈判筹码并增加入院人数。