Griffin Damian R, Starr Adam J, Reinert Charles M, Jones Alan L, Whitlock Shelly
Nuffield Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, University of Oxford, Oxford, England.
J Orthop Trauma. 2003 Jul;17(6):399-405. doi: 10.1097/00005131-200307000-00001.
To measure the failure rate of percutaneous iliosacral screw fixation of vertically unstable pelvic fractures and particularly to test the hypothesis that fixations in which the posterior injury is a vertical fracture of the sacrum are more likely to fail than fixations with dislocations or fracture-dislocations of the sacroiliac joint.
Retrospective review.
Level 1 trauma center.
All patients with pelvic fractures admitted between January 1, 1993, and December 31, 1998, were identified from the trauma registry. Hospital records were used to identify patients treated with iliosacral screws. Radiologic studies were examined to identify patients who had unequivocally vertically unstable pelvic fractures. Immediate postoperative and follow-up anteroposterior, inlet, and outlet radiographs from a minimum of 12 months postinjury were examined. Position, length, and numbers of iliosacral screws and any evidence of screw failure (eg, bending or breakage) were recorded. Residual postoperative displacement and late displacement of the posterior pelvis were measured. The main outcome measure was failure, defined as at least 1cm of combined vertical displacement of the posterior pelvis compared with immediate postoperative position. The main analysis was for association between fracture pattern and failure. Patient demographic data, iliosacral screw position, and anterior pelvic fixation method also were studied.
The study group comprised 62 patients with unequivocally vertically unstable pelvic fractures in whom the posterior injury was treated with closed reduction and percutaneous iliosacral screw fixation. Of patients, 32 had dislocations or fracture-dislocations of the sacroiliac joint, and 30 had vertical fractures of the sacrum. Fixation failed in four patients, all with vertical sacral fractures and all within the first 3 weeks after surgery. These four patients required revision fixation. In two further cases with vertical sacral fractures, there was evidence that the fracture had only barely been held by the fixation, but these fractures healed, and follow-up radiographs did not meet the displacement criteria for failure. A vertical sacral fracture pattern was associated significantly with failure (Fisher exact test, P = 0.04); the excess risk of failure compared with sacroiliac joint injury was 13% (95% confidence interval 1% to 25%). There was no significant association between failure and anterior fixation method, iliosacral screw arrangement or length, or any demographic or injury variable.
Percutaneous iliosacral screw fixation is a useful technique in the management of vertically unstable pelvic fractures, but a vertical sacral fracture should make the surgeon more wary of fixation failure and loss of reduction.
测量垂直不稳定型骨盆骨折经皮髂骶螺钉固定的失败率,尤其是检验以下假设:与骶髂关节脱位或骨折 - 脱位的固定相比,后柱损伤为骶骨垂直骨折的固定更易失败。
回顾性研究。
一级创伤中心。
从创伤登记处识别出1993年1月1日至1998年12月31日期间收治的所有骨盆骨折患者。利用医院记录确定接受髂骶螺钉治疗的患者。通过影像学研究确定明确为垂直不稳定型骨盆骨折的患者。检查伤后至少12个月的术后即刻及随访前后位、入口位和出口位X线片。记录髂骶螺钉的位置、长度和数量以及螺钉失败的任何证据(如弯曲或断裂)。测量术后骨盆后柱的残余移位和晚期移位。主要结局指标为失败,定义为与术后即刻位置相比,骨盆后柱垂直移位合计至少1cm。主要分析骨折类型与失败之间的关联。还研究了患者人口统计学数据、髂骶螺钉位置及骨盆前环固定方法。
研究组包括62例明确为垂直不稳定型骨盆骨折且后柱损伤采用闭合复位和经皮髂骶螺钉固定治疗的患者。其中32例为骶髂关节脱位或骨折 -脱位,30例为骶骨垂直骨折。4例患者固定失败,均为骶骨垂直骨折,且均在术后3周内。这4例患者需要翻修固定。另外2例骶骨垂直骨折患者,有证据表明骨折仅勉强被固定维持,但这些骨折愈合,随访X线片未达到失败的移位标准。骶骨垂直骨折类型与失败显著相关(Fisher确切概率检验,P = 0.04);与骶髂关节损伤相比,失败的额外风险为13%(95%置信区间1%至25%)。失败与前环固定方法、髂骶螺钉排列或长度,或任何人口统计学或损伤变量之间均无显著关联。
经皮髂骶螺钉固定是治疗垂直不稳定型骨盆骨折的一种有用技术,但骶骨垂直骨折应使外科医生更加警惕固定失败和复位丢失。