Lee Daniel J, Westra William H, Staecker Hinrich, Long Donlin, Niparko John K, Slattery William H
Department of Otolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery, The Johns Hopkins School of Medicine, Baltimore, Maryland 21287, USA.
Otol Neurotol. 2003 Jul;24(4):650-60; discussion 660. doi: 10.1097/00129492-200307000-00020.
Stereotactic radiosurgery for vestibular schwannoma entails uncertain long-term risk of tumor recurrence and delayed cranial neuropathies. In addition, the underlying histopathologic changes to the tumor bed are not fully characterized. We seek to understand the clinical and histologic features of recurrent vestibular schwannoma after stereotactic radiation therapy.
Retrospective review.
Tertiary referral center.
Four patients who underwent microsurgical resection of vestibular schwannoma after primary stereotactic radiation therapy.
Patients were treated primarily with gamma knife radiosurgery or fractionated stereotactic radiotherapy followed by salvage microsurgery. Retrosigmoid craniotomy was used in all cases.
Histopathologic review. Preoperative and postoperative facial nerve function was assessed with the House-Brackmann scale.
We observed highly inconsistent radiation changes in the cerebellopontine angle and internal auditory canal. Fibrosis outside and within the tumor bed varied markedly, complicating microsurgical dissection. Light microscopy confirmed the presence of viable tumor in all cases. Histopathologic features were typical of vestibular schwannoma, and there was no significant scarring that could be attributed to radiation effect.
The variable fibrosis in the cerebellopontine angle and lack of radiation changes seen histopathologically in irradiated vestibular schwannoma suggest that a uniform treatment effect was not achieved in these cases. Although all four patients with preoperative cranial neuropathies were found intraoperatively to have fibrosis in the cerebellopontine angle, excellent preservation of facial nerve anatomy and function was possible with salvage microsurgical resection. Additional analyses are needed to clarify the histopathologic and molecular characteristics associated with vestibular schwannoma growth after stereotactic radiation.
立体定向放射外科治疗前庭神经鞘瘤存在肿瘤复发和迟发性颅神经病变的长期风险不确定的问题。此外,肿瘤床潜在的组织病理学变化尚未完全明确。我们旨在了解立体定向放射治疗后复发性前庭神经鞘瘤的临床和组织学特征。
回顾性研究。
三级转诊中心。
4例在初次立体定向放射治疗后接受前庭神经鞘瘤显微手术切除的患者。
患者主要接受伽玛刀放射外科治疗或分次立体定向放射治疗,随后进行挽救性显微手术。所有病例均采用乙状窦后开颅术。
组织病理学检查。采用House-Brackmann量表评估术前和术后面神经功能。
我们观察到桥小脑角和内听道的放射学变化高度不一致。肿瘤床内外的纤维化程度差异显著,使显微手术分离复杂化。光学显微镜检查证实所有病例均存在存活肿瘤。组织病理学特征为典型的前庭神经鞘瘤,且无明显可归因于放射效应的瘢痕形成。
桥小脑角的纤维化程度不一,且在接受放射治疗的前庭神经鞘瘤中组织病理学上未见放射学变化,这表明这些病例未实现统一的治疗效果。尽管所有4例术前存在颅神经病变的患者术中均发现桥小脑角有纤维化,但通过挽救性显微手术切除仍可出色地保留面神经的解剖结构和功能。需要进一步分析以阐明与立体定向放射治疗后前庭神经鞘瘤生长相关的组织病理学和分子特征。