Da Costa Carla P, Okruszek Andrzej, Sigel Helmut
Departement Chemie Anorganische Chemie, Universität Basel Spitalstrasse 51, 4056 Basel, Switzerland.
Chembiochem. 2003 Jul 7;4(7):593-602. doi: 10.1002/cbic.200200551.
The stability constants of the 1:1 complexes formed in aqueous solution between Mg2+, Ca2+, Sr2+, Ba2+, Mn2+, Co2+, Ni2+, Zn2+, or Cd2+ (M2+) and methyl thiophosphate (MeOPS(2-)) or uridine 5'-O-thiomonophosphate (UMPS(2-)) (PS(2-)=MeOPS(2-) or UMPS(2-)) have been determined (potentiometric pH titrations; 25 degrees C; I = 0.1 M, NaNO(3)). Comparison of these results for M(PS) complexes with those known for the parent M(PO) phosphate species, where PO(2-)=CH(3)OPO(2-)(3) or UMP(2-) (uridine 5'-monophosphate), shows that the alkaline earth metal ions, as well as Mn2+, Co2+, and Ni2+ have a higher affinity for phosphate groups than for their thio analogues. However, based on the linear log K(M)(M(R-PO3)) versus pK(H)(H(R-PO3)) relationships (R-PO(2-)(3) simple phosphate monoester or phosphonate ligands with a non-interacting residue R) it becomes clear that the indicated observation is only the result of the lower basicity of the thiophosphate residue. In contrast, the thio complexes of Zn2+ and Cd2+ are more stable than their parent phosphate ones, and this despite the lower basicity of the PS(2-) ligands. This stability increase is identical for M(MeOPS) and M(UMPS) species and amounts to about 0.6 and 2.4 log units for Zn(PS) and Cd(PS), respectively. Since no other binding site is available in MeOPS(2-), this enhanced stability has to be attributed to the S atom. Indeed, from the mentioned stability differences it follows that Cd2+ in Cd(PS) is coordinated by more than 99% to the thiophosphate S atom; the same value holds for Pb(PS), which was studied earlier. The formation degree of the Sbonded isomer amounts to 76+/-6 % for Zn(PS) and is close to zero for the corresponding Mg2+, Ca2+, and Mn2+ species. It is further shown that Zn(MeOPS)(aq)(2+) releases a proton from a coordinated water molecule with pK(a) approximately 6.9; i.e., this deprotonation occurs at a lower pH value than that for the same reaction in Zn(aq)(2+). Since Mg2+, Ca2+, Mn2+, and Cd2+ have a relatively low tendency for hydroxo complex formation, it was possible, for these M2+, to also quantify the stability of the binuclear complexes, M(2)(UMPS-H)+, where one M2+ is thiophosphate-coordinated and the other is coordinated at (N3)(-) of the uracil residue. The impact of the results presented herein regarding M2+/nucleic acid interactions, including those of ribozymes (rescue experiments), is briefly discussed.
已测定Mg2+、Ca2+、Sr2+、Ba2+、Mn2+、Co2+、Ni2+、Zn2+或Cd2+(M2+)与甲基硫代磷酸酯(MeOPS(2-))或尿苷5'-O-硫代单磷酸酯(UMPS(2-))(PS(2-)=MeOPS(2-)或UMPS(2-))在水溶液中形成的1:1配合物的稳定常数(电位pH滴定;25℃;I = 0.1 M,NaNO3)。将这些M(PS)配合物的结果与母体M(PO)磷酸物种(其中PO(2-)=CH3OPO(2-)(3)或UMP(2-)(尿苷5'-单磷酸))的已知结果进行比较,表明碱土金属离子以及Mn2+、Co2+和Ni2+对磷酸基团的亲和力高于对其硫代类似物的亲和力。然而,基于线性log K(M)(M(R-PO3))与pK(H)(H(R-PO))关系(R-PO(2-)(3)为具有非相互作用残基R的简单磷酸单酯或膦酸酯配体),可以清楚地看出,上述观察结果仅是硫代磷酸残基碱性较低的结果。相比之下,Zn2+和Cd2+的硫代配合物比它们的母体磷酸配合物更稳定,尽管PS(2-)配体的碱性较低。对于M(MeOPS)和M(UMPS)物种,这种稳定性增加是相同的,对于Zn(PS)和Cd(PS)分别约为0.6和2.4个对数单位。由于MeOPS(2-)中没有其他结合位点,这种增强的稳定性必须归因于S原子。实际上,从上述稳定性差异可以看出,Cd(PS)中的Cd2+与硫代磷酸S原子的配位率超过99%;对于早期研究的Pb(PS)也是如此。对于Zn(PS),S键合异构体的形成程度为76±6%,而对于相应的Mg2+、Ca2+和Mn2+物种则接近零。进一步表明,Zn(MeOPS)(aq)(2+)从配位水分子中释放一个质子,pK(a)约为6.9;即,这种去质子化发生的pH值低于Zn(aq)(2+)中相同反应的pH值。由于Mg2+、Ca2+、Mn2+和Cd2+形成羟基配合物的倾向相对较低,对于这些M2+来说,也有可能量化双核配合物M(2)(UMPS-H)+的稳定性,其中一个M2+与硫代磷酸配位,另一个与尿嘧啶残基的(N3)(-)配位。本文简要讨论了所呈现结果对M2+/核酸相互作用(包括核酶相互作用(拯救实验))的影响。