Haynes Georgia, Garske Diane, Case Doug, Shen Perry, Levine Edward A, Perrier Nancy D
Surgical Oncology Service, Department of Surgery, Wake Forest University Health Sciences, Winston-Salem, North Carolina 27157, USA.
Am Surg. 2003 Jun;69(6):520-2.
Sentinel lymph node (SLN) mapping has substantially changed the nature of surgery for cancer of the breast. Variables such as tracer type, volume, injection site, timing, and surgical experience have all been extensively evaluated. However, little attention has been paid to the technique of massage for SLN procedures. We sought to evaluate the effects of three different massage techniques on mapping success or accuracy of SLN mapping for breast cancer. All lymphatic mapping procedures for breast cancer at our tertiary-care center were performed by three experienced surgeons using both colloid and dye followed by a 5-minute massage. All data pertaining to SLN identification, histopathology, tumor characteristics, and patient demographics were entered into the Breast Care Center database. Consistent and uniquely differing massage techniques classified as resuscitative, buffer, or knead-like were each used by a specific surgeon. The last 25 consecutive cases performed by two surgeons and the last 24 by one surgeon were evaluated. The overall rate of SLN identification was 97 per cent, and the overall accuracy was 98.7 per cent. There was no statistically significant difference in the rate of SLN identification or accuracy between techniques. The proportions of blue-stained SLNs were similar, but the resuscitative technique yielded fewer hot SLNs (Fisher's exact test, P = 0.02). This method also yielded one false negative case. The three different massage techniques yielded a similar number of blue-stained SLNs. The resuscitative technique yielded fewer hot SLNs than the kneading and buffer methods. Our results failed to demonstrate a superior breast massage technique for identifying sentinel nodes. A larger randomized trial is needed to confirm these findings.
前哨淋巴结(SLN)定位已极大地改变了乳腺癌手术的性质。诸如示踪剂类型、体积、注射部位、时间以及手术经验等变量均已得到广泛评估。然而,对于SLN手术中的按摩技术却鲜有关注。我们旨在评估三种不同的按摩技术对乳腺癌SLN定位的成功率或准确性的影响。我们三级医疗中心所有的乳腺癌淋巴定位手术均由三位经验丰富的外科医生进行,他们同时使用胶体和染料,随后进行5分钟的按摩。所有与SLN识别、组织病理学、肿瘤特征以及患者人口统计学相关的数据都录入了乳腺护理中心数据库。一位特定的外科医生会使用分别归类为复苏式、缓冲式或揉捏式的连贯且独特不同的按摩技术。我们评估了两位外科医生连续进行的最后25例病例以及一位外科医生进行的最后24例病例。SLN识别的总体率为97%,总体准确率为98.7%。不同技术在SLN识别率或准确性方面无统计学显著差异。蓝色染色的SLN比例相似,但复苏式技术产生的热SLN较少(Fisher精确检验,P = 0.02)。该方法还出现了一例假阴性病例。三种不同的按摩技术产生的蓝色染色SLN数量相似。复苏式技术产生的热SLN比揉捏式和缓冲式方法少。我们的结果未能证明存在一种用于识别前哨淋巴结的更优乳房按摩技术。需要进行更大规模的随机试验来证实这些发现。