Shepherd Suzanne M, Dudewicz Douglas M, Hindo Walid A
Department of Radiology, Finch University of Health Sciences, Chicago Medical School, 3333 Green Bay Rd, North Chicago, IL 60064, USA.
Acad Radiol. 2003 Jul;10(7):786-93. doi: 10.1016/s1076-6332(03)80124-1.
The purpose of this study was to determine the influence of sophomore electives in radiology on medical students' career choices and later clinical practice as physicians and to assess the need for change in the curriculum.
A survey questionnaire created by the Department of Radiology was sent to graduates of the Chicago Medical School, North Chicago, Ill, who had been offered a series of three sophomore electives in radiology between academic years 1978 and 1998. The survey included five questions concerning the utility of the electives.
Of the 2,883 questionnaires mailed, 31 were undeliverable and 411 (14%) were completed and returned. A total of 347 (84%) of the respondents had enrolled in one or more of the sophomore radiology electives, and 325 of 340 (96%) stated that the instruction received was valuable to their careers. In addition, 54 of 333 respondents (16%) indicated that the radiology electives influenced their choice of specialty, and 322 of 328 (98%) believed that the courses should remain part of the sophomore year elective choices. Within the respondent pool, 40 of 261 (15%) identified themselves as radiologists. Among radiologists and nonradiologists, respectively, 39 of 40 (98%) and 308 of 371 (83%) had enrolled in one or more of the sophomore electives in radiology, 34 of 39 (87%) and 291 of 301 (97%) stated that knowledge gained from the courses proved valuable to their careers, 30 of 39 (77%) and 24 of 303 (8%) were influenced by the electives in their choice of specialty, and 37 of 39 (95%) and 285 of 289 (99%) stated that radiology should continue to be offered during the sophomore year.
Practicing physicians overwhelmingly supported the continuation of the sophomore radiology electives. Some suggested that radiology should be a required course or clinical clerkship.
本研究旨在确定放射科大二选修课程对医学生职业选择及日后临床实践的影响,并评估课程改革的必要性。
放射科设计的调查问卷被发送给伊利诺伊州北芝加哥市芝加哥医学院的毕业生,这些毕业生在1978年至1998学年期间参加过一系列三门放射科大二选修课程。该调查包含五个关于选修课程实用性的问题。
在邮寄的2883份问卷中,31份无法投递,411份(14%)被填写并返回。共有347名(84%)受访者参加过一门或多门放射科大二选修课程,340名受访者中的325名(96%)表示所学内容对其职业发展有价值。此外,333名受访者中的54名(16%)表示放射科选修课程影响了他们的专业选择,328名受访者中的322名(98%)认为这些课程应继续作为大二选修课程的一部分。在受访者群体中,261名中的40名(15%)表明自己是放射科医生。在放射科医生和非放射科医生中,分别有40名中的39名(98%)和371名中的308名(83%)参加过一门或多门放射科大二选修课程,39名中的34名(87%)和301名中的291名(97%)表示从课程中学到的知识对其职业发展有价值,39名中的30名(77%)和非放射科医生303名中的24名(8%)受选修课程影响选择了专业,39名中的37名(95%)和289名中的285名(99%)表示大二应继续开设放射科课程。
执业医生绝大多数支持继续开设放射科大二选修课程。一些人建议放射科应成为必修课或临床实习课程。