Macpherson C C
St. George's University School of Medicine, PO Box 7, St. George's, Grenada, West Indies.
Dev World Bioeth. 2001 May;1(1):57-68. doi: 10.1111/1471-8847.00008.
There is international recognition of the need for sustainable research ethics committees to provide ethical review of human subjects research in developing countries, but many developing countries do not have such committees (often called 'IRBs'). Theoretical and practical uncertainties encountered by an IRB on the Caribbean island of Grenada offer insight into ethical review of research in developing countries. Theoretical uncertainties include questions about whether means of ensuring confidentiality and obtaining informed consent will be effective in local settings, and whether deviations from Western norms are justifiable. International guidelines are helpful in addressing these concerns, but are subject to interpretation. Guidelines are less helpful in practical areas like selecting members or chairs. They do not address what sort of procedures and paperwork will work in a developing country, or IRBs' relationships to governments that have no mandate for them. Experiences presented here show that IRBs in developing countries can sustainably adhere to international standards. Sustainability requires knowledge, personal commitment, and an official mandate to uphold international standards. Capacity building must therefore focus on educational programs to make developing country leaders knowledgeable about the value of international guidelines to their nations. Such knowledge is needed before people will become motivated to promote, implement, and uphold their guidelines. People in developing countries must help design bridges to help their nations put international standards into practice. The structure of such bridges may, of necessity, very in different settings.
国际上已认识到需要有可持续的研究伦理委员会,以便对发展中国家的人体研究进行伦理审查,但许多发展中国家并没有这样的委员会(通常称为“机构审查委员会”)。加勒比海岛国格林纳达的一个机构审查委员会所遇到的理论和实践上的不确定性,为了解发展中国家的研究伦理审查提供了见解。理论上的不确定性包括:确保保密和获得知情同意的方式在当地环境中是否有效,以及偏离西方规范是否合理等问题。国际准则有助于解决这些问题,但可能存在不同解读。在诸如挑选成员或主席等实际领域,准则的帮助则较小。它们并未涉及何种程序和文件在发展中国家可行,也未涉及机构审查委员会与对其没有授权的政府之间的关系。这里介绍的经验表明,发展中国家的机构审查委员会能够可持续地遵守国际标准。可持续性需要知识、个人承诺以及维护国际标准的官方授权。因此,能力建设必须侧重于开展教育项目,以使发展中国家的领导人了解国际准则对其国家的价值。在人们有动力去推广、实施和维护这些准则之前,需要具备这样的知识。发展中国家的人们必须协助设计桥梁,以帮助其国家将国际标准付诸实践。这种桥梁的结构可能因不同情况而必然有所不同。