• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

伦理委员会。研究伦理:超越指南。

Ethics committees. Research ethics: beyond the guidelines.

作者信息

Macpherson C C

机构信息

St. George's University School of Medicine, PO Box 7, St. George's, Grenada, West Indies.

出版信息

Dev World Bioeth. 2001 May;1(1):57-68. doi: 10.1111/1471-8847.00008.

DOI:10.1111/1471-8847.00008
PMID:12870511
Abstract

There is international recognition of the need for sustainable research ethics committees to provide ethical review of human subjects research in developing countries, but many developing countries do not have such committees (often called 'IRBs'). Theoretical and practical uncertainties encountered by an IRB on the Caribbean island of Grenada offer insight into ethical review of research in developing countries. Theoretical uncertainties include questions about whether means of ensuring confidentiality and obtaining informed consent will be effective in local settings, and whether deviations from Western norms are justifiable. International guidelines are helpful in addressing these concerns, but are subject to interpretation. Guidelines are less helpful in practical areas like selecting members or chairs. They do not address what sort of procedures and paperwork will work in a developing country, or IRBs' relationships to governments that have no mandate for them. Experiences presented here show that IRBs in developing countries can sustainably adhere to international standards. Sustainability requires knowledge, personal commitment, and an official mandate to uphold international standards. Capacity building must therefore focus on educational programs to make developing country leaders knowledgeable about the value of international guidelines to their nations. Such knowledge is needed before people will become motivated to promote, implement, and uphold their guidelines. People in developing countries must help design bridges to help their nations put international standards into practice. The structure of such bridges may, of necessity, very in different settings.

摘要

国际上已认识到需要有可持续的研究伦理委员会,以便对发展中国家的人体研究进行伦理审查,但许多发展中国家并没有这样的委员会(通常称为“机构审查委员会”)。加勒比海岛国格林纳达的一个机构审查委员会所遇到的理论和实践上的不确定性,为了解发展中国家的研究伦理审查提供了见解。理论上的不确定性包括:确保保密和获得知情同意的方式在当地环境中是否有效,以及偏离西方规范是否合理等问题。国际准则有助于解决这些问题,但可能存在不同解读。在诸如挑选成员或主席等实际领域,准则的帮助则较小。它们并未涉及何种程序和文件在发展中国家可行,也未涉及机构审查委员会与对其没有授权的政府之间的关系。这里介绍的经验表明,发展中国家的机构审查委员会能够可持续地遵守国际标准。可持续性需要知识、个人承诺以及维护国际标准的官方授权。因此,能力建设必须侧重于开展教育项目,以使发展中国家的领导人了解国际准则对其国家的价值。在人们有动力去推广、实施和维护这些准则之前,需要具备这样的知识。发展中国家的人们必须协助设计桥梁,以帮助其国家将国际标准付诸实践。这种桥梁的结构可能因不同情况而必然有所不同。

相似文献

1
Ethics committees. Research ethics: beyond the guidelines.伦理委员会。研究伦理:超越指南。
Dev World Bioeth. 2001 May;1(1):57-68. doi: 10.1111/1471-8847.00008.
2
Research ethics committees: a regional approach.研究伦理委员会:一种区域性方法。
Theor Med Bioeth. 1999 Apr;20(2):161-79. doi: 10.1023/a:1009989104496.
3
Ethical oversight of research in developing countries.发展中国家研究的伦理监督。
IRB. 2003 Mar-Apr;25(2):1-10.
4
Guidelines for IRB review of international collaborative medical research: a proposal.国际合作医学研究的机构审查委员会(IRB)审查指南:一项提案。
J Law Med Ethics. 1999 Spring;27(1):87-94. doi: 10.1111/j.1748-720x.1999.tb01440.x.
5
Research ethics committee: getting started.研究伦理委员会:起步指南。
West Indian Med J. 2001 Sep;50(3):186-8.
6
Ethical standards for human subject research in developing countries.发展中国家人体研究的伦理标准。
IRB. 1992 May-Jun;14(3):7-8.
7
Ethics review procedures for research in developing countries: a basic presumption of guilt.发展中国家研究的伦理审查程序:有罪的基本推定。
CMAJ. 2004 Aug 3;171(3):248-9. doi: 10.1503/cmaj.1031121.
8
Ten questions institutional review boards should ask when reviewing international clinical research protocols.机构审查委员会在审查国际临床研究方案时应提出的十个问题。
IRB. 2003 Mar-Apr;25(2):14-8.
9
Descriptive ethics: a qualitative study of local research ethics committees in Mexico.描述性伦理学:对墨西哥当地研究伦理委员会的定性研究。
Dev World Bioeth. 2006 May;6(2):95-105. doi: 10.1111/j.1471-8847.2006.00144.x.
10
Law, ethics, and biomedical research involving human subjects in developing countries.法律、伦理与发展中国家涉及人类受试者的生物医学研究。
J Clin Res Drug Dev. 1989 Mar;3(1):83-8.

引用本文的文献

1
Linguistic and Cultural Challenges in Communication and Translation in US-Sponsored HIV Prevention Research in Emerging Economies.美国资助的新兴经济体艾滋病预防研究中的沟通与翻译所面临的语言和文化挑战
PLoS One. 2015 Jul 30;10(7):e0133394. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0133394. eCollection 2015.
2
Reviewing HIV-Related Research in Emerging Economies: The Role of Government Reviewing Agencies.审视新兴经济体中与艾滋病病毒相关的研究:政府审查机构的作用
Dev World Bioeth. 2016 Apr;16(1):4-14. doi: 10.1111/dewb.12072. Epub 2014 Nov 10.
3
Informed consent in international research: the rationale for different approaches.
知情同意在国际研究中的应用:不同方法的基本原理。
Am J Trop Med Hyg. 2010 Oct;83(4):743-7. doi: 10.4269/ajtmh.2010.10-0014.
4
The structure and function of research ethics committees in Africa: a case study.非洲研究伦理委员会的结构与功能:一项案例研究
PLoS Med. 2007 Jan;4(1):e3. doi: 10.1371/journal.pmed.0040003.