Zhang Yi, McGuire Michelle, White David P, Ling Liming
Division of Sleep Medicine, Brigham and Women's Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts 02115, USA.
J Physiol. 2003 Sep 15;551(Pt 3):981-91. doi: 10.1113/jphysiol.2003.048157. Epub 2003 Jul 18.
All respiratory long-term facilitation (LTF) is induced by inspiratory-excitatory stimulation, suggesting that LTF needs inspiratory augmentation and is the result of a Hebbian mechanism (coincident pre- and post-synaptic activity strengthens synapses). The present study examined the long-term effects of episodic inspiratory-inhibitory vagus nerve stimulation (VNS) on phrenic nerve activity. We hypothesized that episodic VNS would induce phrenic long-term depression. The results are compared with those obtained following serotonin receptor antagonism or episodic carotid sinus nerve stimulation (CSNS). Integrated phrenic neurograms were measured before, during and after three episodes of 5 min VNS (50 Hz, 0.1 ms), each separated by a 5 min interval, at a low (approximately 50 microA), medium (approximately 200 microA) or high (approximately 500 microA) stimulus intensity in anaesthetized, vagotomized, neuromuscularly blocked and artificially ventilated rats. Medium- and high-intensity VNS eliminated rhythmic phrenic activity during VNS, while low-intensity VNS only reduced phrenic burst frequency. At 60 min post-VNS, phrenic amplitude was higher than baseline (35 +/- 5% above baseline, mean +/- S.E.M., P < 0.05) in the high-intensity group but not in the low- (-4 +/- 4%) or medium-intensity groups (-10 +/- 15%), or in the high-intensity with methysergide group (4 mg kg(-1), i.p.) (-11 +/- 5%). These data, which are inconsistent with our hypothesis, indicate that phrenic-inhibitory VNS induces a serotonin-dependent phrenic LTF similar to that induced by phrenic-excitatory CSNS (33 +/- 7%) and may require activation of high-threshold afferent fibres. These data also suggest that the synapses on phrenic motoneurons do not use the Hebbian mechanism in this LTF, as these motoneurons were suppressed during VNS.
所有呼吸性长期易化(LTF)均由吸气兴奋性刺激诱导产生,这表明LTF需要吸气增强,并且是一种赫布机制(突触前和突触后活动同步可强化突触)的结果。本研究检测了间歇性吸气抑制性迷走神经刺激(VNS)对膈神经活动的长期影响。我们假设间歇性VNS会诱导膈神经长期抑制。将结果与5-羟色胺受体拮抗或间歇性颈动脉窦神经刺激(CSNS)后获得的结果进行比较。在麻醉、迷走神经切断、神经肌肉阻断和人工通气的大鼠中,以低(约50微安)、中(约200微安)或高(约500微安)刺激强度,在每次持续5分钟的3次VNS(50赫兹,0.1毫秒)刺激期间及之后,测量整合膈神经电图,每次刺激间隔5分钟。中强度和高强度VNS在刺激期间消除了膈神经的节律性活动,而低强度VNS仅降低了膈神经爆发频率。在VNS后60分钟,高强度组膈神经振幅高于基线(比基线高35±5%,平均值±标准误,P<0.05),而低强度组(-4±4%)、中强度组(-10±15%)或高强度加麦角酰二乙胺组(4毫克/千克,腹腔注射)(-11±5%)则未出现这种情况。这些与我们假设不一致的数据表明,膈神经抑制性VNS诱导了一种与膈神经兴奋性CSNS诱导的类似的5-羟色胺依赖性膈神经LTF(33±7%),并且可能需要激活高阈值传入纤维。这些数据还表明,在这种LTF中,膈神经运动神经元上的突触并不使用赫布机制,因为这些运动神经元在VNS期间受到了抑制。