Vos R J, Hakvoort J H M, Jordans R W J, Ibelings B W
Institute for Environmental Studies, Free University, De Boelelaan 1115, Amsterdam 1081 HV, The Netherlands.
Sci Total Environ. 2003 Aug 1;312(1-3):221-43. doi: 10.1016/S0048-9697(03)00225-0.
Representative spatial patterns of eutrophication variables cannot be produced using traditional in situ sampling techniques. Spatial heterogeneity complicates the study of seasonal and long-term trends and the evaluation of water management policies. Remote sensing, however, with its broad view has the potential to deliver the relevant information. This paper will address the added value of synoptic eutrophication maps to the standard monitoring program of two large, spatially and temporally variable lakes in the Netherlands, Lakes IJssel and Marken. Remote sensing images were obtained from SeaWiFS; and combined with hyperspectral reflectance data from the airborne EPS-a sensor and the shipboard PR-650 spectroradiometer. The PR-650 data were used in selecting the most appropriate algorithms for SeaWiFS and EPS-a. A special algorithm for case II waters with high chlorophyll content was applied to SeaWiFS data to obtain chlorophyll concentrations. Synoptic maps of suspended matter were retrieved using inversion of a model for irradiance reflectance. For the airborne sensor inversion of reflectance was used for both suspended matter and chlorophyll. Satellite and airborne sensors clearly are complementary to each other. Comparison of satellite data with the airborne data and the (scarcely available) in situ data reveal underlying problems with: (i) validation of remote sensing images; and (ii) comparing data at different spatial and temporal scales. In our study, we found a reasonable agreement between different data sources at seasonal time scales, but at shorter time scales the differences can be (much) larger. In situ data suffer from poor reproducibility, related to the natural variability at small spatial scales (patchiness), combined with a significant temporal variability. The standard in situ monitoring program in Lakes IJssel and Marken lacks both the necessary spatial coverage as well as an appropriate sampling frequency. This indicates that for reliable monitoring, a synoptic data set, sampled at a high frequency is required. Remote sensing can partially fulfil this demand but still lacks the demanded frequency, mainly due to regular cloud cover. The answer may be in a multiplatform monitoring approach, as used in our study (combining in situ data with shipboard, airborne and satellite optical data) and in combining monitoring data with models. Satellite remote sensing is most powerful in determining properties that are inherent to the whole lake system, like the overall mean chlorophyll-a concentration. Computational models may meet the demand for a sufficiently high sampling frequency by deterministic interpolation of the data in time.
使用传统的现场采样技术无法生成富营养化变量的代表性空间模式。空间异质性使季节和长期趋势的研究以及水管理政策的评估变得复杂。然而,遥感技术凭借其广阔的视野有潜力提供相关信息。本文将探讨荷兰两个大型、时空变化的湖泊——艾瑟尔湖和马尔肯湖的综合富营养化地图对标准监测计划的附加价值。遥感图像来自SeaWiFS;并与来自机载EPS - a传感器和船载PR - 650光谱辐射计的高光谱反射率数据相结合。PR - 650数据用于为SeaWiFS和EPS - a选择最合适的算法。一种针对叶绿素含量高的II类水体的特殊算法应用于SeaWiFS数据以获取叶绿素浓度。悬浮物的综合地图通过辐照度反射率模型的反演获得。对于机载传感器,反射率反演用于悬浮物和叶绿素。卫星和机载传感器显然是互补的。将卫星数据与机载数据以及(稀缺的)现场数据进行比较,揭示了以下潜在问题:(i)遥感图像的验证;(ii)不同空间和时间尺度数据的比较。在我们的研究中,我们发现在季节时间尺度上不同数据源之间有合理的一致性,但在较短时间尺度上差异可能(大得多)。现场数据的可重复性较差,这与小空间尺度上的自然变异性(斑块性)以及显著的时间变异性有关。艾瑟尔湖和马尔肯湖的标准现场监测计划既缺乏必要的空间覆盖范围,也缺乏合适的采样频率。这表明为了进行可靠的监测,需要一个高频采样的综合数据集。遥感可以部分满足这一需求,但仍然缺乏所需的频率,主要是由于云层的定期覆盖。答案可能在于多平台监测方法,如我们研究中所使用的(将现场数据与船载、机载和卫星光学数据相结合)以及将监测数据与模型相结合。卫星遥感在确定整个湖泊系统固有的属性方面最强大,例如叶绿素a的总体平均浓度。计算模型可以通过对数据进行确定性时间内插来满足对足够高采样频率的需求。