Forestier François, Hirschi Marie, Rouget Pierre, Rigal Jean-Cristophe, Videcoq Michel, Girardet Pierre, Durand Michel, Maitrasse Bruno, Girard Claude, Lehot Jean-Jacques, Du Grés Bernard, Sellin Michel, Depoix Jean-Pol, Janvier Gérard, Longrois Dan
Department of Anesthesia and Intensive Care, Centre Hospitalier Universitaire (CHU) de Bordeaux, France.
Anesthesiology. 2003 Aug;99(2):334-46. doi: 10.1097/00000542-200308000-00015.
To provide anesthesia for cardiac surgery, hypnotics and opioids are frequently titrated on variables such as mean arterial pressure and heart rate. In this study conducted in patients scheduled to undergo coronary artery bypass grafting, propofol and sufentanil, both administered by computer-controlled infusion, were titrated on the Bispectral Index (BIS) values using a predefined algorithm.
After written informed consent, 110 patients, 95 men and 15 women aged 61 (9) yr [mean (SD)], were randomly allocated to receive predicted sufentanil effect site concentrations (Ce) of 0.5, 0.75, 1, 1.25, and 1.5 ng/ml, decreased by a third after sternotomy (groups 1-5). Target induction propofol concentration was 1.5 microg/ml and subsequently adjusted on BIS values. The following parameters were recorded: BIS values, predicted propofol Ce, the number of changes of propofol target, mean arterial pressure, heart rate, the number of bolus injection and doses of vasoconstrictor and vasodilator drugs, time to tracheal extubation, postoperative awareness and satisfaction scores, and cumulative morphine doses for the first postoperative day.
One patient randomized to group 1 required 0.75 ng/ml sufentanil Ce instead of 0.5 ng/ml for increased BIS values on tracheal intubation. BIS values were similar in the five groups. The predicted propofol Ce values were different (P < 0.05; analysis of variance) among the five groups: 1.59 (0.47) to 1.23 (0.25) microg/ml in group 1 and group 4, respectively. Significantly fewer changes of propofol target were required in group 4 as compared to group 1. There were no differences among the five groups for mean arterial pressure, heart rate, time to tracheal extubation, awareness, satisfaction scores, and morphine requirements.
These results suggest the BIS, as part of an algorithm that uses both the absolute BIS value and its increase following tracheal intubation, can be used to effectively titrate both propofol and sufentanil. A predicted sufentanil Ce of 1.25 ng/ml before and 0.8 ng/ml after sternotomy was associated with the lowest predicted propofol Ce and fewer changes of propofol target. Lower sufentanil concentrations required higher propofol concentrations and more frequent changes of the target propofol concentration and were associated with similar hemodynamic tolerance.
为心脏手术实施麻醉时,催眠药和阿片类药物常根据平均动脉压和心率等变量进行滴定。在这项针对计划接受冠状动脉搭桥术患者的研究中,通过计算机控制输注给药的丙泊酚和舒芬太尼,使用预定义算法根据脑电双频指数(BIS)值进行滴定。
在获得书面知情同意后,110例患者(95例男性和15例女性,年龄61(9)岁[均值(标准差)])被随机分配,接受预测的舒芬太尼效应室浓度(Ce)分别为0.5、0.75、1、1.25和1.5 ng/ml,胸骨切开术后降低三分之一(1 - 5组)。目标诱导丙泊酚浓度为1.5 μg/ml,随后根据BIS值进行调整。记录以下参数:BIS值、预测的丙泊酚Ce、丙泊酚目标值的变化次数、平均动脉压、心率、推注次数以及血管收缩剂和血管扩张剂药物的剂量、气管拔管时间、术后知晓情况和满意度评分,以及术后第一天的吗啡累积剂量。
随机分配至1组的1例患者因气管插管时BIS值升高,需要0.75 ng/ml的舒芬太尼Ce而非0.5 ng/ml。五组的BIS值相似。五组之间预测的丙泊酚Ce值不同(P < 0.05;方差分析):1组和4组分别为1.59(0.47)至1.23(0.25)μg/ml。与1组相比,4组所需的丙泊酚目标值变化明显更少。五组在平均动脉压、心率、气管拔管时间、知晓情况、满意度评分和吗啡需求量方面无差异。
这些结果表明,作为一种同时使用绝对BIS值及其在气管插管后升高情况的算法的一部分,BIS可用于有效滴定丙泊酚和舒芬太尼。胸骨切开术前预测的舒芬太尼Ce为1.25 ng/ml,术后为0.8 ng/ml,与最低的预测丙泊酚Ce以及更少的丙泊酚目标值变化相关。较低的舒芬太尼浓度需要更高的丙泊酚浓度以及更频繁地改变目标丙泊酚浓度,并且与相似的血流动力学耐受性相关。