Aquino Suzanne L, Asmuth Jane C, Alpert Nathaniel M, Halpern Elkan F, Fischman Alan J
Department of Radiology, FND 202, Massachusetts General Hospital, 55 Fruit Street, Boston, MA 02114, USA.
J Comput Assist Tomogr. 2003 Jul-Aug;27(4):479-84. doi: 10.1097/00004728-200307000-00004.
To determine if volumetric nonlinear registration or registration of thoracic computed tomography (CT) and 2-[18F]-fluoro-2-deoxy-D-glucose-positron emission tomography (FDG-PET) datasets changes the detection of mediastinal and hilar nodal disease in patients undergoing staging for lung cancer and if it has any impact on radiologic lung cancer staging.
Computer-based image registration was performed on 45 clinical thoracic helical CT and FDG-PET scans of patients with lung cancer who were staged by mediastinoscopy and/or thoracotomy. Thoracic CT, FDG-PET, and registration datasets were each interpreted by 2 readers for the presence of metastatic nodal disease and were staged independently of each other. Results were compared with surgical pathologic findings.
One hundred and thirty lymph node stations in the mediastinum and hila were evaluated each on CT, PET, and registration datasets. Sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value, and negative predictive value, respectively, for detecting metastatic nodal disease for CT were 74%, 78%, 55%, 88%; for PET with CT side by side, 59% to 76%, 77% to 89%, 48% to 68%, and 84% to 91%; and for CT-PET registration, 71% to 76%, 89% to 96%, 70% to 86%, and 90% to 91%. Registration images were significantly more sensitive in detecting nodal disease over PET for 1 reader (P = 0.0156) and were more specific than PET (P = 0.0107 and 0.0017) in identifying the absence of mediastinal disease for both readers. Registration was significantly more accurate for staging when compared with PET for both readers (P = 0.002 and 0.035).
Registration of CT and FDG-PET datasets significantly improved the specificity of detecting metastatic disease. In addition, registration improved the radiologic staging of lung cancer patients when compared with CT or FDG-PET alone.
确定容积非线性配准或胸部计算机断层扫描(CT)与2-[18F]-氟-2-脱氧-D-葡萄糖-正电子发射断层扫描(FDG-PET)数据集的配准是否会改变肺癌分期患者纵隔和肺门淋巴结疾病的检测情况,以及其对肺癌放射学分期是否有任何影响。
对45例经纵隔镜检查和/或开胸手术分期的肺癌患者的临床胸部螺旋CT和FDG-PET扫描进行基于计算机的图像配准。胸部CT、FDG-PET和配准数据集分别由2名阅片者解读是否存在转移性淋巴结疾病,且彼此独立分期。将结果与手术病理结果进行比较。
在CT、PET和配准数据集上分别评估了纵隔和肺门的130个淋巴结站。CT检测转移性淋巴结疾病的敏感性、特异性、阳性预测值和阴性预测值分别为74%、78%、55%、88%;PET与CT并排时为59%至76%、77%至89%、48%至68%、84%至91%;CT-PET配准时为71%至76%、89%至96%、70%至86%、90%至91%。对于1名阅片者,配准图像检测淋巴结疾病的敏感性显著高于PET(P = 0.0156),在两名阅片者识别纵隔无疾病时,配准图像比PET更具特异性(P = 0.0107和0.0017)。与PET相比,两名阅片者在分期时配准的准确性均显著更高(P = 0.002和0.035)。
CT和FDG-PET数据集的配准显著提高了检测转移性疾病的特异性。此外,与单独的CT或FDG-PET相比,配准改善了肺癌患者的放射学分期。