Suppr超能文献

批判实在论:护理评估研究的前进方向?

Critical realism: a way forward for evaluation research in nursing?

作者信息

McEvoy Phil, Richards David

机构信息

CPN Bolton, Salford and Trafford Mental Health Partnership NHS Trust, Manchester, UK.

出版信息

J Adv Nurs. 2003 Aug;43(4):411-20. doi: 10.1046/j.1365-2648.2003.02730.x.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

Critical realism is a relatively new philosophical perspective that combines a realist ontology with a relativist epistemology in subscribing to a form of "robust" relativism. The potential benefits of adopting a critical realist approach are considered in two areas of evaluation research: theory-driven programme evaluation and policy evaluation.

AIM

The aim of the paper is to identify the main features of critical realism and explore its potential as a philosophical framework in the field of evaluation research.

CONCLUSION

We argue that critical realism provides a coherent framework for evaluation research that is based on the understanding of causal mechanisms. This is particularly important for frontline services seeking to use evidence-based interventions, as interventions need to be properly understood if they are to be used effectively in the context of clinical practice. Critical realism can also add depth to policy analysis. However, there is a potential for critical realists to drift beyond the boundary that separates scientific knowledge from speculative theory when making recommendations about the best course of action to follow.

摘要

背景

批判实在论是一种相对较新的哲学视角,它将实在论本体论与相对主义认识论相结合,秉持一种“稳健”的相对主义形式。在评估研究的两个领域——理论驱动的项目评估和政策评估中,探讨了采用批判实在论方法的潜在益处。

目的

本文旨在确定批判实在论的主要特征,并探索其作为评估研究领域哲学框架的潜力。

结论

我们认为,批判实在论为基于因果机制理解的评估研究提供了一个连贯的框架。这对于寻求采用循证干预措施的一线服务尤为重要,因为如果要在临床实践中有效运用干预措施,就需要对其有恰当的理解。批判实在论还可以深化政策分析。然而,批判实在论者在就最佳行动方案提出建议时,有可能偏离将科学知识与思辨理论区分开来的界限。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验