Viestenz Arne, Wakili Nina, Jünemann Anselm G M, Horn Folkert K, Mardin Christian Y
Department of Ophthalmology, University of Erlangen-Nuremberg, Schwabchanlage 6, 91054 Erlangen, Germany.
Graefes Arch Clin Exp Ophthalmol. 2003 Aug;241(8):652-5. doi: 10.1007/s00417-003-0736-3. Epub 2003 Jul 25.
Macrodiscs with physiologic macrocups and elevated intraocular pressure (IOP) are frequently suspicious for glaucoma. Patients with an elevated c/d ratio and an IOP of more than 21 mmHg are often treated for glaucoma. We investigated a possible relationship between macrodiscs, IOP and central corneal thickness.
Using the Erlangen glaucoma registry, 341 out of 1,096 consecutive patients with unremarkable and repeated visual field (Octopus 500, G1-3, MD<2.1) were selected. Most of these patients had been sent as glaucoma suspects. The following data were collected: corneal ultrasound pachymetry (Tomey, AL-2000), IOP profile, visual acuity and central corneal power. The morphometric analysis was performed by planimetry using the Littmann formula. Optic nerve heads with a disc area of more than 3.1 mm(2) were defined as macrodiscs.
Patients were subdivided into the following groups: group A: healthy macrodiscs, IOP <22 mmHg (87 patients); group B: healthy macrodiscs, IOP >21 mmHg (66 patients); group C: normal-sized healthy discs, IOP <22 mmHg (93 patients); group D: normal-sized healthy discs, IOP >21 mmHg (95 patients). Mean corneal thickness was: group A: 575+/-36 microm, group B: 596+/-37 microm, group C: 557+/-31 microm and group D: 585+/-38 microm ( P=0.003). Mean central corneal power measured: group A: 41.7+/-1.3 D, group B: 42.4+/-1.3 D, group C: 43.0+/-1.2 D and group D: 42.8+/-1.2 D ( P<0.05). The maximum of IOP was: group A: 17.6+/-3.1, group B: 26.2+/-4.1, group C: 17.2+/-3.4 and group D: 29.7+/-5.5 mmHg. Optic disc size measurements were: group A: 3.91+/-0.66, group B: 3.65+/-0.6, group C: 2.56+/-0.30 mm(2) and group D: 2.39+/-0.39 microm, respectively.
Macrodiscs with elevated IOP have a higher corneal curvature (mean: +0.7 D) and a thicker central cornea (mean: +21 microm) compared to macrodiscs without elevated IOP. An exact evaluation of optic disc morphology in combination with pachymetric and keratometric measurements in relation to IOP could avoid an overtreatment in patients with suspect primary open-angle glaucoma.
具有生理性大视杯和眼压升高(IOP)的大视盘常常令人怀疑患有青光眼。杯盘比升高且眼压超过21 mmHg的患者常被当作青光眼进行治疗。我们研究了大视盘、眼压和中央角膜厚度之间可能存在的关系。
利用埃尔朗根青光眼登记处的数据,从1096例连续的视野正常且重复检查(Octopus 500,G1 - 3,平均缺损<2.1)的患者中选取了341例。这些患者大多被当作青光眼疑似患者送来。收集了以下数据:角膜超声测厚(Tomey,AL - 2000)、眼压曲线、视力和中央角膜屈光度。使用利特曼公式通过面积测量法进行形态学分析。视盘面积超过3.1平方毫米的视神经乳头被定义为大视盘。
患者被分为以下几组:A组:健康大视盘,眼压<22 mmHg(87例患者);B组:健康大视盘,眼压>21 mmHg(66例患者);C组:正常大小的健康视盘,眼压<22 mmHg(93例患者);D组:正常大小的健康视盘,眼压>21 mmHg(95例患者)。平均角膜厚度为:A组:575±36微米,B组:596±37微米,C组:557±31微米,D组:585±38微米(P = 0.003)。平均中央角膜屈光度测量值为:A组:41.7±1.3 D,B组:42.4±1.3 D,C组:43.0±1.2 D,D组:42.8±1.2 D(P<0.05)。眼压最大值为:A组:17.6±3.1,B组:26.2±4.1,C组:17.2±3.4,D组:29.7±5.5 mmHg。视盘大小测量值分别为:A组:3.91±0.66,B组:3.65±0.6,C组:2.56±0.30平方毫米,D组:2.39±0.39微米。
与眼压未升高的大视盘相比,眼压升高的大视盘具有更高的角膜曲率(平均:+0.7 D)和更厚的中央角膜(平均:+21微米)。结合眼压测量对视盘形态进行精确评估以及角膜厚度和角膜曲率测量,可避免对疑似原发性开角型青光眼患者进行过度治疗。