Poirier Paul, Bogaty Peter, Philippon François, Garneau Caroline, Fortin Claudette, Dumesnil Jean-G
Institut Universitaire de Cardiologie et de Pneumologie, Laval Hospital, Ste-Foy, Québec, Canada.
Metabolism. 2003 Aug;52(8):1056-61. doi: 10.1016/s0026-0495(03)00091-x.
Diabetic cardiomyopathy is an ill-defined entity. This study was designed to explore the possible association between left ventricular diastolic dysfunction (LVDD) and cardiac autonomic neuropathy (CAN) independently from metabolic control. Three groups of 10 age-matched men each with well-controlled type 2 diabetes were studied: (1) subjects with normal diastolic function, (2) subjects with LVDD characterized by impaired LV relaxation, and (3) subjects with a more severe form of LVDD characterized by a pseudonormalized pattern of LV filling. No subject had evidence of clinical diabetic complications, coronary artery disease (CAD), hypertension, congestive heart failure, or thyroid or overt renal disease, and all had a negative maximal exercise test. LVDD was evaluated by Doppler echocardiographic and CAN was evaluated using spectral analysis of heart rate variability (HRV; time and frequency domains) from 24-hour Holter recordings. Findings showed that the high frequency power (HF: 0.15 to 0.4 Hz) tends to decrease with worsening diastolic function; 5.0 +/- 0.2 ms(2) (mean +/- SE) in group 1, 4.2 +/- 0.3 ms(2) in group 2, and 3.9 +/- 0.4 ms(2) (P =.03) in group 3, respectively, whereas the low frequency power (LF: 0.04 to 0.15 Hz) was similar between groups. In the time domain, the mean squared differences of the successive RR intervals (rMSDD) also showed the same pattern, ie, 31.0 +/- 2.8 ms, 23.8 +/- 1.6 ms, and 21.5 +/- 2.9 ms in groups 1, 2, and 3, respectively (P =.03). The E/A ratio correlated significantly with indices of parasympathetic modulation (HF; r = 0.448, P =.013; rMSDD: r = 0.457, P =.011; pNN50: r = 0.425, P =.019). LVDD and CAN are associated in patients with otherwise uncomplicated well-controlled type 2 diabetes. The parameters defining these 2 abnormalities may serve to better define diabetic cardiomyopathy as a distinct entity and could eventually become useful prognostic indicators as it has been shown in nondiabetic populations.
糖尿病性心肌病是一个定义尚不明确的实体。本研究旨在探讨左心室舒张功能障碍(LVDD)与心脏自主神经病变(CAN)之间可能存在的关联,且不考虑代谢控制情况。研究了三组各有10名年龄匹配的男性,他们均为2型糖尿病且病情控制良好:(1)舒张功能正常的受试者;(2)以左心室舒张功能受损为特征的LVDD受试者;(3)以左心室充盈假性正常化模式为特征的更严重形式的LVDD受试者。所有受试者均无临床糖尿病并发症、冠状动脉疾病(CAD)、高血压、充血性心力衰竭、甲状腺疾病或明显肾脏疾病的证据,且所有受试者最大运动试验结果均为阴性。通过多普勒超声心动图评估LVDD,使用24小时动态心电图记录的心率变异性(HRV;时域和频域)频谱分析评估CAN。研究结果显示,高频功率(HF:0.15至0.4Hz)往往随着舒张功能恶化而降低;第1组为5.0±0.2ms²(均值±标准误),第2组为4.2±0.3ms²,第3组为3.9±0.4ms²(P = 0.03),而低频功率(LF:0.04至0.15Hz)在各组之间相似。在时域中,连续RR间期的均方差(rMSDD)也呈现相同模式,即第1组、第2组和第3组分别为31.0±2.8ms、23.8±1.6ms和21.5±2.9ms(P = 0.03)。E/A比值与副交感神经调节指标(HF;r = 0.448,P = 0.013;rMSDD:r = 0.457,P = 0.011;pNN50:r = 0.425,P = 0.019)显著相关。在其他方面无并发症且病情控制良好的2型糖尿病患者中,LVDD与CAN相关。定义这两种异常的参数可能有助于更好地将糖尿病性心肌病定义为一个独特的实体,并且最终可能成为有用的预后指标,正如在非糖尿病人群中所显示的那样。