• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

感到被冒犯:人格及被戏弄经历对戏弄行为和情绪反应的影响

Taking offense: effects of personality and teasing history on behavioral and emotional reactions to teasing.

作者信息

Bollmer Julie M, Harris Monica J, Milich Richard, Georgesen John C

机构信息

Department of Psychology, University of Kentucky, Lexington, Kentucky 40506-0044, USA.

出版信息

J Pers. 2003 Aug;71(4):557-603. doi: 10.1111/1467-6494.7104003.

DOI:10.1111/1467-6494.7104003
PMID:12901431
Abstract

This study investigated how global personality traits and teasing history are related to participants' emotional and behavioral reactions to an actual teasing event. College undergraduates (N = 108) worked on a task with a same-sex confederate. While interacting, the confederate either teased participants about how slowly they were working on the task or made a benign comment about the nature of the task. Analyses revealed that even mild teasing can generate negativity towards the teaser and interaction. More interestingly, however, personality moderated reactions to teasing, as teasing condition interacted with each of the Big Five personality domains in theoretically meaningful ways. Childhood teasing history also moderated reactions to teasing, as frequent victims and frequent teasers responded in different ways.

摘要

本研究调查了整体人格特质和被取笑经历如何与参与者对实际取笑事件的情绪和行为反应相关。大学本科生(N = 108)与一名同性同盟者一起完成一项任务。在互动过程中,同盟者要么取笑参与者完成任务的速度有多慢,要么就任务的性质发表善意的评论。分析表明,即使是轻微的取笑也会引发对取笑者和互动的负面情绪。然而,更有趣的是,人格对取笑反应起到了调节作用,因为取笑情境与大五人格领域中的每一个都以理论上有意义的方式相互作用。童年时期的被取笑经历也对取笑反应起到了调节作用,因为频繁的受害者和频繁的取笑者的反应方式不同。

相似文献

1
Taking offense: effects of personality and teasing history on behavioral and emotional reactions to teasing.感到被冒犯:人格及被戏弄经历对戏弄行为和情绪反应的影响
J Pers. 2003 Aug;71(4):557-603. doi: 10.1111/1467-6494.7104003.
2
Teasing in hierarchical and intimate relations.在等级关系和亲密关系中的取笑行为。
J Pers Soc Psychol. 1998 Nov;75(5):1231-47. doi: 10.1037//0022-3514.75.5.1231.
3
Intentions in teasing: when "just kidding" just isn't good enough.开玩笑的意图:当“只是开个玩笑”并不够时。
J Pers Soc Psychol. 2006 Mar;90(3):412-25. doi: 10.1037/0022-3514.90.3.412.
4
Just teasing: a conceptual analysis and empirical review.只是调侃:一项概念分析与实证综述。
Psychol Bull. 2001 Mar;127(2):229-48. doi: 10.1037/0033-2909.127.2.229.
5
The role of teasing in development and vice versa.
J Dev Behav Pediatr. 1997 Apr;18(2):97-101. doi: 10.1097/00004703-199704000-00004.
6
Tease or threat? Judging social interactions from bodily expressions.挑逗还是威胁?从身体表情判断社交互动。
Neuroimage. 2010 Jan 15;49(2):1717-27. doi: 10.1016/j.neuroimage.2009.09.065. Epub 2009 Oct 3.
7
Teasing: for superiority or solidarity?取笑:为了优越感还是团结?
J Gen Psychol. 2005 Jul;132(3):255-66. doi: 10.3200/GENP.132.3.255-266.
8
Using retrospective reports to develop profiles of harmful versus playful teasing experiences.利用回顾性报告来形成有害与善意戏弄经历的特征描述。
J Adolesc. 2024 Oct;96(7):1512-1526. doi: 10.1002/jad.12359. Epub 2024 Jun 7.
9
Predicting suicide ideation through intrapersonal and interpersonal factors: The interplay of Big-Five personality traits and social support.通过个人因素和人际因素预测自杀意念:大五人格特质与社会支持的相互作用
Personal Ment Health. 2015 Nov;9(4):308-18. doi: 10.1002/pmh.1301. Epub 2015 Jul 6.
10
The source and impact of appearance teasing: an examination by sex and weight status among early adolescents from the Czech Republic.外貌取笑的来源及影响:对捷克共和国青少年早期的性别与体重状况的调查
J Sch Health. 2015 Mar;85(3):163-70. doi: 10.1111/josh.12236.

引用本文的文献

1
Assessment of psychosocial functioning and its risk factors in children with pectus excavatum.评估漏斗胸患儿的心理社会功能及其危险因素。
Health Qual Life Outcomes. 2011 May 4;9:28. doi: 10.1186/1477-7525-9-28.
2
A 5-year follow-up study of aggression at work and psychological health.一项关于工作场所攻击行为与心理健康的5年随访研究。
Int J Behav Med. 2005;12(4):256-65. doi: 10.1207/s15327558ijbm1204_6.