Parizotto Symonne Pimentel, Rodrigues Célia Regina Martins Delgado, Singer Júlio da Motta, Sef Henry Corazza
Department of Orthodontics and Pediatric Dentistry, School of Dentistry, Institute of Mathematics and Statistics-University of São Paulo, São Paulo, Brazil.
Pesqui Odontol Bras. 2003 Jan-Mar;17(1):17-23. doi: 10.1590/s1517-74912003000100004. Epub 2003 Aug 5.
The main objective of this study was to compare the effectiveness of a low cost toothbrush ("monoblock") to that of a conventional toothbrush with and without addition of dentifrice with respect to the removal of dental plaque. Thirty-two 4- to 6-year-old children took part in this study: they were evaluated under four experimental conditions defined by the combinations of the values of two factors, toothbrush (conventional or monoblock) and use of dentifrice (with or without). The effectiveness of the treatments was defined in terms of the reduction of a bacterial plaque index evaluated before and after toothbrushing. No statistically significant differences were detected between the two types of toothbrushes with respect to the reduction of the bacterial plaque index. Similarly, there were no statistical evidences that the use of dentifrice improves the mechanical control of dental plaque. These results are important from a public health point of view, specially in developing countries, where the dissemination of educational and preventive techniques of low cost are fundamental.
本研究的主要目的是比较低成本牙刷(“整体式”)与传统牙刷在使用牙膏和不使用牙膏的情况下清除牙菌斑的效果。32名4至6岁的儿童参与了本研究:他们在由两个因素(牙刷类型:传统或整体式;是否使用牙膏)的值组合定义的四种实验条件下接受评估。治疗效果通过刷牙前后评估的细菌菌斑指数的降低来定义。在降低细菌菌斑指数方面,两种类型的牙刷之间未检测到统计学上的显著差异。同样,也没有统计证据表明使用牙膏能改善对牙菌斑的机械控制。从公共卫生的角度来看,这些结果很重要,特别是在发展中国家,低成本教育和预防技术的传播至关重要。