Suppr超能文献

帕金森病实践指南

Practice Guidelines for Parkinson's disease.

作者信息

Yamamoto Mitsutoshi

机构信息

Department of Neurology, Kagawa Prefectural Central Hospital, 5-4-16 Bancho, Takamatsu 760-8557, Japan.

出版信息

Parkinsonism Relat Disord. 2003 Aug;9 Suppl 2:S111-5. doi: 10.1016/s1353-8020(03)00064-6.

Abstract

'Practice Guidelines (PG) or treatment guidelines' are not infallible guidelines but tools with which to support a clinical decision, i.e. one factor when making a clinical decision. When making a clinical decision, medical practice is determined by taking into consideration PG, a patient's preferences, and a country's social and healthcare systems. Even if a PG provides a treatment method based on a high-level of evidence, the method simply represents a mean result obtained from past clinical studies, which are not always uniformly applicable to all patients. When consulting a PG, it is advisable to know in advance what group/society/organization prepared it, the purpose of its preparation, and the developmental method, including social equity, whether healthcare costs are assumed in the PG or whether the pharmaceutical industry had substantial involvement in its development. Thus, PGs need to be developed according to the actual conditions in a country or institution. As to the questions whose answers are not provided in a PG, these issues have to be defined and assessed through a literature search. This is the so-called implementation of Evidence-Based Medicine (EBM). The concepts of EBM further require the provision of better evidence. A PG is always fated to be out of date by the time it is published because new evidence is continually being published. It is therefore, always necessary to search for the most up to date evidence available.

摘要

“实践指南(PG)或治疗指南”并非绝对可靠的准则,而是用于支持临床决策的工具,即在做出临床决策时的一个考量因素。在做出临床决策时,医疗实践需综合考虑实践指南、患者偏好以及国家的社会和医疗体系。即便实践指南基于高水平证据提供了一种治疗方法,该方法也仅仅代表从过往临床研究中得出的一个平均结果,并不总是能统一适用于所有患者。在参考实践指南时,最好提前了解是哪个群体/社会/组织制定了该指南、制定目的以及制定方法,包括社会公平性、实践指南中是否考虑了医疗成本或者制药行业在其制定过程中是否有重大参与。因此,实践指南需要根据一个国家或机构的实际情况来制定。对于实践指南中未给出答案的问题,这些问题必须通过文献检索来界定和评估。这就是所谓的循证医学(EBM)的实施。循证医学的概念进一步要求提供更好的证据。实践指南在发布之时往往就注定过时了,因为新的证据在不断发表。因此,始终有必要寻找现有的最新证据。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验