Roy Anju Anne, Lemberg Kara E, Chidiac Peter
Department of Physiology and Pharmacology, Medical Sciences Building, University of Western Ontario, London, Ontario N6A 5C1, Canada.
Mol Pharmacol. 2003 Sep;64(3):587-93. doi: 10.1124/mol.64.3.587.
N-terminally green fluorescent protein (GFP)-tagged regulator of G protein signaling (RGS) 2 and RGS4 fusion proteins expressed in human embryonic kidney 293 cells localized to the nucleus and cytosol, respectively. They were selectively recruited to the plasma membrane by G proteins and correspondingly by receptors that activate those G proteins: GFP-RGS2 when coexpressed with Galphas, beta2-adrenergic receptor, Galphaq, or AT1A angiotensin II receptor, and GFP-RGS4 when coexpressed with Galphai2 or M2 muscarinic receptor. G protein mutants with reduced RGS affinity did not produce this effect, implying that the recruitment involves direct binding to G proteins and is independent of downstream signaling events. Neither agonists nor inverse agonists altered receptor-promoted RGS association with the plasma membrane, and expressing either constitutively activated or poorly activated G protein mutants produced effects similar to those of their wild-type counterparts. Thus, intracellular interactions between these proteins seem to be relatively stable and insensitive to the activation state of the G protein, in contrast to the transient increases in RGS-G protein association known to be caused by G protein activation in solution-based assays. G protein effects on RGS localization were mirrored by RGS effects on G protein function. RGS4 was more potent than RGS2 in promoting steady-state Gi GTPase activity, whereas RGS2 inhibited Gs-dependent increases in intracellular cAMP, suggesting that G protein signaling in cells is regulated by the selective recruitment of RGS proteins to the plasma membrane.
在人胚肾293细胞中表达的N端带有绿色荧光蛋白(GFP)标记的G蛋白信号调节因子(RGS)2和RGS4融合蛋白分别定位于细胞核和细胞质。它们被G蛋白选择性招募到质膜,相应地也被激活这些G蛋白的受体招募:当与Gαs、β2 - 肾上腺素能受体、Gαq或AT1A血管紧张素II受体共表达时,GFP - RGS2被招募;当与Gαi2或M2毒蕈碱受体共表达时,GFP - RGS4被招募。RGS亲和力降低的G蛋白突变体不会产生这种效应,这意味着这种招募涉及与G蛋白的直接结合,且独立于下游信号事件。激动剂和反向激动剂均未改变受体促进的RGS与质膜的结合,表达组成型激活或激活不良的G蛋白突变体产生的效应与其野生型对应物相似。因此,与基于溶液的分析中已知的由G蛋白激活引起的RGS - G蛋白结合的短暂增加相反,这些蛋白之间的细胞内相互作用似乎相对稳定且对G蛋白的激活状态不敏感。G蛋白对RGS定位的影响被RGS对G蛋白功能的影响所反映。在促进稳态Gi GTP酶活性方面,RGS4比RGS2更有效,而RGS2抑制Gs依赖性细胞内cAMP的增加,这表明细胞中的G蛋白信号传导受RGS蛋白向质膜的选择性招募调节。