Duncan Pamela, Studenski Stephanie, Richards Lorie, Gollub Steven, Lai Sue Min, Reker Dean, Perera Subashan, Yates Joni, Koch Victoria, Rigler Sally, Johnson Dallas
University of Florida Brooks Center for Rehabilitation Studies and the Department of Veteran Affairs Rehabilitation Outcomes Center, Gainesville 32610, USA.
Stroke. 2003 Sep;34(9):2173-80. doi: 10.1161/01.STR.0000083699.95351.F2. Epub 2003 Aug 14.
Rehabilitation care after stroke is highly variable and increasingly shorter in duration. The effect of therapeutic exercise on impairments and functional limitations after stroke is not clear. The objective of this study was to determine whether a structured, progressive, physiologically based exercise program for subacute stroke produces gains greater than those attributable to spontaneous recovery and usual care.
This randomized, controlled, single-blind clinical trial was conducted in a metropolitan area and 17 participating healthcare institutions. We included persons with stroke who were living in the community. One hundred patients (mean age, 70 years; mean Orpington score, 3.4) consented and were randomized from a screened sample of 582. Ninety-two subjects completed the trial. Intervention was a structured, progressive, physiologically based, therapist-supervised, in-home program of thirty-six 90-minute sessions over 12 weeks targeting flexibility, strength, balance, endurance, and upper-extremity function. Main outcome measures were postintervention strength (ankle and knee isometric peak torque, grip strength), upper- and lower-extremity motor control (Fugl Meyer), balance (Berg and functional reach), endurance (peak aerobic capacity and exercise duration), upper-extremity function (Wolf Motor Function Test), and mobility (timed 10-m walk and 6-minute walk distance).
In the intention-to-treat multivariate analysis of variance testing the overall effect, the intervention produced greater gains than usual care (Wilk's lambda=0.64, P=0.0056). Both intervention and usual care groups improved in strength, balance, upper- and lower-extremity motor control, upper-extremity function, and gait velocity. Gains for the intervention group exceeded those in the usual care group in balance, endurance, peak aerobic capacity, and mobility. Upper-extremity gains exceeded those in the usual care group only in patients with higher baseline function.
This structured, progressive program of therapeutic exercise in persons who had completed acute rehabilitation services produced gains in endurance, balance, and mobility beyond those attributable to spontaneous recovery and usual care.
中风后的康复护理差异很大,且持续时间越来越短。治疗性运动对中风后损伤和功能受限的影响尚不清楚。本研究的目的是确定针对亚急性中风的结构化、渐进性、基于生理学的运动计划是否能产生比自发恢复和常规护理更大的改善。
这项随机、对照、单盲临床试验在一个大都市地区和17家参与的医疗机构进行。我们纳入了居住在社区的中风患者。100名患者(平均年龄70岁;平均奥平顿评分3.4)同意参与研究,他们是从582名筛查样本中随机抽取的。92名受试者完成了试验。干预措施是一个结构化、渐进性、基于生理学、由治疗师监督的家庭计划,在12周内进行36次每次90分钟的训练,目标是提高灵活性、力量、平衡、耐力和上肢功能。主要结局指标包括干预后的力量(踝关节和膝关节等长峰值扭矩、握力)、上肢和下肢运动控制(Fugl Meyer评分)、平衡(Berg平衡量表和功能性伸展)、耐力(最大有氧能力峰值和运动持续时间)、上肢功能(Wolf运动功能测试)和活动能力(10米定时步行和6分钟步行距离)。
在意向性治疗多变量方差分析中测试总体效果时,干预组比常规护理组有更大的改善(威尔克斯λ=0.64,P=0.0056)。干预组和常规护理组在力量、平衡、上肢和下肢运动控制、上肢功能和步态速度方面均有改善。干预组在平衡、耐力、最大有氧能力峰值和活动能力方面的改善超过了常规护理组。仅在基线功能较高的患者中,上肢的改善超过了常规护理组。
对于已完成急性康复服务的患者,这种结构化、渐进性的治疗性运动计划在耐力、平衡和活动能力方面产生的改善超过了自发恢复和常规护理。