Fuller Matthew A, Shermock Kenneth M, Secic Michelle, Grogg Amy L
Pharmacy Service, Louis Stokes Cleveland VAMC, Brecksville, Ohio 44141-3204, USA.
Pharmacotherapy. 2003 Aug;23(8):1037-43. doi: 10.1592/phco.23.8.1037.32876.
A growing body of literature suggests that certain atypical antipsychotics, especially olanzapine and clozapine, may induce glucoregulatory dysfunction. We assessed the differences in risk of developing diabetes mellitus during treatment with olanzapine and risperidone by using patients treated with haloperidol and fluphenazine as control subjects in whom we would not expect to see an increased risk.
We conducted a retrospective analysis of the Veteran's Integrated Service Network 10 Veterans Affairs (VA) database. Data for patients receiving olanzapine, risperidone, haloperidol, or fluphenazine from January 1, 1997-December 31, 2000, were included. Diabetes was defined as any health system encounter associated with the International Classification of Diseases, Ninth Revision, Clinical Modification diagnosis for diabetes (250.xx) or prescription for a hypoglycemic agent. Data of patients with markers for diabetes within 1 year before their index date, female patients, racial groups other than Caucasian or African-American, and patients receiving clozapine were not analyzed. We performed a Cox regression, with antipsychotic therapy as a time-dependent covariate. Other covariates considered for inclusion in the final model were number of days supply of antipsychotic drug, age, race, psychiatric diagnoses, substance abuse, lithium, valproic acid, and other typical or atypical antipsychotic agents.
Data for 5837 patients were analyzed. Overall rate of developing diabetes in the study population was 6.3% (368 of 5837 patients). Olanzapine therapy was associated with a significantly higher risk of development of diabetes compared with risperidone (hazard ratio [HR] 1.37, 95% confidence interval 1.06-1.76, p=0.016) while controlling for race, age, diagnosis, substance abuse, lithium, valproic acid, and other atypical antipsychotic agents. No differences in the rate of developing diabetes were detected between fluphenazine and risperidone (HR 1.11, p=0.69), or haloperidol and risperidone (HR 0.89, p=0.41).
Olanzapine was associated with a 37% (HR 1.37) increased risk of development of diabetes compared with risperidone in a VA population, even after adjusting for other factors associated with the development of diabetes and temporal exposure to study drug. Because of limitations associated with database research, prospective studies should be conducted to corroborate these findings.
越来越多的文献表明,某些非典型抗精神病药物,尤其是奥氮平和氯氮平,可能会诱发糖代谢调节功能障碍。我们以接受氟哌啶醇和氟奋乃静治疗的患者作为对照,评估了使用奥氮平和利培酮治疗期间发生糖尿病的风险差异,因为我们预计在这些对照患者中不会出现风险增加的情况。
我们对退伍军人综合服务网络10的退伍军人事务(VA)数据库进行了回顾性分析。纳入了1997年1月1日至2000年12月31日期间接受奥氮平、利培酮、氟哌啶醇或氟奋乃静治疗的患者数据。糖尿病定义为任何与国际疾病分类第九版临床修订本中糖尿病诊断(250.xx)相关的医疗系统接触或降糖药物处方。未分析索引日期前1年内有糖尿病标志物的患者、女性患者、非白种人或非裔美国人以外的种族群体以及接受氯氮平治疗的患者的数据。我们进行了Cox回归分析,将抗精神病药物治疗作为时间依赖性协变量。最终模型中考虑纳入的其他协变量包括抗精神病药物供应天数、年龄、种族、精神疾病诊断、药物滥用、锂盐、丙戊酸以及其他典型或非典型抗精神病药物。
分析了5837例患者的数据。研究人群中糖尿病的总体发生率为6.3%(5837例患者中有368例)。在控制种族(原文为race,此处结合上下文推测可能是综合考虑多种因素,暂译为“多种因素”更合适)、年龄、诊断、药物滥用、锂盐、丙戊酸以及其他非典型抗精神病药物的情况下,与利培酮相比,奥氮平治疗与糖尿病发生风险显著更高相关(风险比[HR]1.37,95%置信区间1.06 - 1.76,p = 0.016)。氟奋乃静与利培酮之间(HR 1.11,p = 0.69)以及氟哌啶醇与利培酮之间(HR 0.89,p = 0.41)在糖尿病发生率上未检测到差异。
在VA人群中,即使在调整了与糖尿病发生相关的其他因素以及研究药物的暴露时间后,与利培酮相比,奥氮平发生糖尿病的风险增加了37%(HR 1.37)。由于数据库研究存在局限性,应进行前瞻性研究以证实这些发现。