Pereira G R, Lim B K, Ing C, Medeiros H F
Department of Pediatrics, Children's Hospital of Philadelphia, University of Pennsylvania, School of Medicine 19104.
Yonsei Med J. 1992 Sep;33(3):224-31. doi: 10.3349/ymj.1992.33.3.224.
The efficacy and safety of using umbilical venous catheters vs. peripheral venous catheters for the delivery of parenteral nutrition was studied in 129 critically ill premature infants who were treated in a neonatal intensive care unit for the first 3 weeks of life. Infants who received parenteral nutrition by umbilical venous catheter had greater parenteral caloric intake, lower physiologic weight loss and greater weight gain during the study as compared to infants who received parenteral nutrition by peripheral vein. While the overall incidence of sepsis was comparable in both groups (19% vs 19.7%), benign and transient episodes of hyperglycemia were seen more commonly in infants receiving parenteral nutrition by umbilical catheters. None of the hyperglycemic infants, however, required insulin therapy. The incidence of other metabolic complication was comparable in both groups. At follow up, no evidence of portal hypertension was detected in any of the infants up to 66 months of age treated with umbilical venous catheters. We conclude that the use of umbilical venous catheter allows for a comparably safe and a more appropriate parenteral nutrition support than peripheral catheters in critically ill premature neonates.
在一家新生儿重症监护病房对129名出生后最初3周接受治疗的危重新生儿进行了研究,比较脐静脉导管与外周静脉导管用于胃肠外营养输注的有效性和安全性。与通过外周静脉接受胃肠外营养的婴儿相比,通过脐静脉导管接受胃肠外营养的婴儿在研究期间有更高的胃肠外热量摄入、更低的生理性体重减轻和更大的体重增加。虽然两组败血症的总体发生率相当(19%对19.7%),但脐静脉导管胃肠外营养的婴儿中更常见良性和短暂性高血糖发作。然而,没有高血糖婴儿需要胰岛素治疗。两组其他代谢并发症的发生率相当。随访时,在接受脐静脉导管治疗的婴儿中,直至66个月龄均未发现门静脉高压的证据。我们得出结论,在危重新生儿中,与外周导管相比,使用脐静脉导管进行胃肠外营养支持同样安全且更合适。