Airoldi F, Di Mario C, Stankovic G, Briguori C, Carlino M, Chieffo A, Liistro F, Montorfano M, Pagnotta P, Spanos V, Tavano D, Colombo A
EMO Centro Cuore, Columbus Clinic and Interventional Cardiology Unit, San Raffaele Hospital IRCCS, Milan, Italy.
Heart. 2003 Sep;89(9):1050-4. doi: 10.1136/heart.89.9.1050.
Lesions located at the ostium of the left anterior descending coronary artery (LAD) are considered an ideal target for directional atherectomy (DCA), but few data are available about the value of using this strategy before stenting in comparison with stenting alone.
To investigate the immediate and mid term clinical and angiographic results of DCA followed by stent implantation for ostial LAD lesions.
Retrospective comparison of the immediate and mid term angiographic and clinical results of a series of 117 consecutive patients with de novo lesions located at the ostium of the LAD. Of these, 46 underwent DCA before stenting and 71 were treated with stenting alone.
Technical success in the two groups was similar at around 98%. DCA plus stenting provided a larger minimum lumen diameter at the end of the procedure than stenting alone (3.57 (0.59) mm v 3.33 (0.49) mm, p = 0.022). There were no differences for in-hospital major adverse events (MACE) (7.5% for atherectomy plus stenting, and 5.3% for stenting alone; p = 0.41). All patients had clinical follow up at a mean of 7.9 (2.7) months. Angiographic follow up was done in 89 patients (76%) at a mean of 5.9 (2.2) months. The atherectomy plus stenting group had a larger minimum lumen diameter than the stenting group (2.79 (0.64) mm v 2.26 (0.85) mm, p = 0.004) and a lower binary restenosis rate (13.8% v 33.3%, p = 0.031). Six month MACE were reduced in the atherectomy plus stenting group (8.7% v 23.9%, p = 0.048).
Debulking before stenting in de novo lesions located at the ostium of the LAD is safe and is associated with a high rate of technical success. Follow up data show that DCA plus stenting results in a significantly larger minimum lumen diameter and a lower incidence of restenosis than stenting alone.
位于左前降支冠状动脉(LAD)开口处的病变被认为是定向旋切术(DCA)的理想靶点,但与单纯支架置入术相比,关于在支架置入术前使用该策略的价值的资料较少。
研究对LAD开口处病变先行DCA然后置入支架的近期和中期临床及血管造影结果。
对117例连续性新发LAD开口处病变患者的系列研究的近期和中期血管造影及临床结果进行回顾性比较。其中,46例在支架置入术前接受了DCA,71例仅接受了支架置入术。
两组的技术成功率相似,约为98%。DCA联合支架置入术在手术结束时提供的最小管腔直径大于单纯支架置入术(3.57(0.59)mm对3.33(0.49)mm,p = 0.022)。院内主要不良事件(MACE)无差异(旋切术联合支架置入术为7.5%,单纯支架置入术为5.3%;p = 0.41)。所有患者均进行了平均7.9(2.7)个月的临床随访。89例患者(76%)进行了平均5.9(2.2)个月的血管造影随访。旋切术联合支架置入术组的最小管腔直径大于支架置入术组(2.79(0.64)mm对2.26(0.85)mm,p = 0.004),二元再狭窄率较低(13.8%对33.3%,p = 0.031)。旋切术联合支架置入术组的6个月MACE有所降低(8.7%对23.9%,p = 0.048)。
对LAD开口处新发病变在支架置入术前进行减容是安全的,且技术成功率高。随访数据显示,与单纯支架置入术相比,DCA联合支架置入术可使最小管腔直径显著增大,再狭窄发生率降低。