Magee Thomas, Shapiro Marc, Rodriguez John, Williams David
Neuroimaging Institute, 27 E Hibiscus Boulevard, Melbourne, FL 32901, USA.
Radiology. 2003 Oct;229(1):159-63. doi: 10.1148/radiol.2291020988. Epub 2003 Aug 27.
To assess which postoperative patients benefit most from MR arthrography of the knee.
One hundred consecutive MR arthrograms obtained in patients who had previous knee surgery underwent retrospective review in consensus by three radiologists after prospective reading by one of the three radiologists. Criterion on MR arthrograms for a retear was abnormal tracking of an intraarticular dilute gadolinium-based contrast material and saline mixture into the substance of a meniscus. Patients were separated into three groups: those with more than 25% meniscal resection, those with less than 25% meniscal resection, and those with meniscal repair. All 100 patients had preoperative MR images to review directly in conjunction with the postoperative MR images. Fifty-seven of these 100 patients underwent second-look arthroscopy.
Nine patients had MR findings consistent with avascular necrosis. Nineteen patients had marked degenerative arthrosis in the area of previous surgery. Seven patients had chondral defects or injuries. Twenty-nine patients had clear MR evidence of a meniscal retear without any contrast material injected into the joint. In 32 of the 100 patients, intraarticular contrast material was useful in demonstrating a retear. Of these 32 patients, 22 had MR arthrographic evidence of a retear, while 10 had no clear MR arthrographic finding to explain postoperative pain. Four additional patients had no clear MR imaging or MR arthrographic abnormality. All patients with meniscal repair (n = 16) needed MR arthrography to diagnose a residual or recurrent meniscal tear. No patient with less than 25% meniscal resection (n = 23) needed MR arthrography to demonstrate a residual or recurrent meniscal tear. Sixteen of 61 patients with more than 25% meniscal resection needed MR arthrography to demonstrate a residual or recurrent meniscal tear.
All patients with meniscal repair required MR arthrography. All patients with meniscal resection of more than 25%, who did not have severe degenerative arthrosis, chondral injuries, or avascular necrosis required MR arthrography. Patients with less than 25% meniscal resection did not need MR arthrography.
评估哪些膝关节术后患者能从膝关节磁共振关节造影中获益最多。
对100例曾接受膝关节手术患者的连续磁共振关节造影图像进行回顾性分析。这100例图像先由三位放射科医生中的一位进行前瞻性阅片,之后三位放射科医生共同进行回顾性分析。磁共振关节造影诊断半月板再撕裂的标准为关节内稀释的钆基对比剂与生理盐水混合物异常进入半月板实质内。患者被分为三组:半月板切除超过25%的患者、半月板切除少于25%的患者以及半月板修复的患者。所有100例患者均有术前磁共振图像,以便与术后磁共振图像直接对照查看。这100例患者中有57例接受了二次关节镜检查。
9例患者磁共振成像表现符合缺血性坏死。19例患者在既往手术区域有明显的退行性关节炎。7例患者有软骨缺损或损伤。29例患者磁共振成像有明确的半月板再撕裂证据,且关节内未注入任何对比剂。在100例患者中的32例,关节内对比剂有助于显示再撕裂。在这32例患者中,22例磁共振关节造影有再撕裂证据,而10例没有明确的磁共振关节造影表现来解释术后疼痛。另外4例患者磁共振成像或磁共振关节造影无明显异常。所有半月板修复患者(n = 16)均需要磁共振关节造影来诊断残留或复发性半月板撕裂。半月板切除少于25%的患者(n = 23)均不需要磁共振关节造影来显示残留或复发性半月板撕裂。61例半月板切除超过25%的患者中有16例需要磁共振关节造影来显示残留或复发性半月板撕裂。
所有半月板修复患者均需要磁共振关节造影。所有半月板切除超过25%且无严重退行性关节炎、软骨损伤或缺血性坏死的患者均需要磁共振关节造影。半月板切除少于25%的患者不需要磁共振关节造影。