Suppr超能文献

采用结膜过敏原激发模型对富马酸酮替芬和奈多罗米钠眼药水预防眼部瘙痒进行安慰剂对照比较。

A placebo-controlled comparison of ketotifen fumarate and nedocromil sodium ophthalmic solutions for the prevention of ocular itching with the conjunctival allergen challenge model.

作者信息

Greiner Jack V, Minno George

机构信息

Schepens Eye Research Institute, Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts 02114, USA.

出版信息

Clin Ther. 2003 Jul;25(7):1988-2005. doi: 10.1016/s0149-2918(03)80200-x.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

Ketotifen fumarate 0.025% ophthalmic solution and nedocromil sodium 2.0% ophthalmic solution are 2 topical antiallergic medications with different modes of action and efficacy profiles. Both solutions are indicated for ocular itching associated with allergic conjunctivitis.

OBJECTIVE

This study compared the efficacy, safety, and comfort of ketotifen fumarate 0.025% ophthalmic solution and nedocromil sodium 2.0% ophthalmic solution for the prevention of ocular itching, using the conjunctival allergen challenge (CAC) model.

METHODS

This was a single-center, double-masked, contralateral, randomized, placebo- and active-controlled CAC clinical trial. Subjects aged >10 years with a history of allergic hypersensitivity who responded to the CAC at screening visits 1 and 2 qualified for randomization at visit 3. At visit 3 (day 21) and visit 4 (day 35), subjects received 1 of 3 treatments: ketotifen, nedocromil, or placebo (artificial tears), randomized by eye. Allergen challenges were conducted at 5 minutes posttreatment dose (visit 3) and 12 hours posttreatment dose (visit 4). At each visit, subjects evaluated their ocular itching every 30 seconds for 20 minutes. At visit 4, subjects evaluated the comfort of the medication immediately after instillation, at 30 seconds after instillation, and at l, 2, 5, and 10 minutes after instillation. The subjects were also queried about overall eyedrop comfort by choosing from descriptive terms and about overall eyedrop preference based on comfort and perceived efficacy.

RESULTS

Eighty-five subjects were screened for this study. Fifty-nine (28 males, 31 females; mean age, 38.7 years) qualified and were randomized to receive study medications. Ketotifen-treated eyes experienced significantly less ocular itching induced by CAC than nedocromil-treated eyes and those that received placebo at both the 5-minute and 12-hour posttreatment allergen challenges (all P < 0.05). Nedocromil-treated eyes showed no statistical or clinical differences from placebo at any time point. Ketotifen-treated eyes showed no differences in comfort from those that received placebo but were significantly more comfortable than nedocromil-treated eyes at 1, 2, 5, and 10 minutes after instillation (all P < 0.05). On the basis of comfort and subjective efficacy, 60% of subjects preferred ketotifen, 21% preferred nedocromil, and 19% preferred placebo.

CONCLUSION

Ketotifen was significantly more effective and comfortable than nedocromil at both 5 minutes and 12 hours after administration in this CAC model.

摘要

背景

0.025%富马酸酮替芬滴眼液和2.0%奈多罗米钠滴眼液是两种作用方式和疗效不同的局部抗过敏药物。两种滴眼液均适用于治疗与过敏性结膜炎相关的眼部瘙痒。

目的

本研究采用结膜过敏原激发(CAC)模型,比较0.025%富马酸酮替芬滴眼液和2.0%奈多罗米钠滴眼液预防眼部瘙痒的疗效、安全性和舒适度。

方法

这是一项单中心、双盲、对侧、随机、安慰剂对照和阳性对照的CAC临床试验。年龄大于10岁、有过敏超敏反应病史且在第1次和第2次筛查访视时对CAC有反应的受试者有资格在第3次访视时随机分组。在第3次访视(第21天)和第4次访视(第35天),受试者接受3种治疗中的1种:酮替芬、奈多罗米或安慰剂(人工泪液),按眼睛随机分配。在治疗后剂量给药5分钟(第3次访视)和治疗后剂量给药12小时(第4次访视)时进行过敏原激发。每次访视时,受试者在20分钟内每隔30秒评估一次眼部瘙痒情况。在第4次访视时,受试者在滴入药物后立即、滴入后30秒、滴入后1、2、5和10分钟评估药物的舒适度。还通过选择描述性词语询问受试者关于眼药水总体舒适度的情况,以及基于舒适度和感知疗效的眼药水总体偏好情况。

结果

85名受试者接受了本研究筛查。59名(28名男性,31名女性;平均年龄38.7岁)符合条件并被随机分配接受研究药物治疗。在治疗后过敏原激发的5分钟和12小时时,接受酮替芬治疗的眼睛因CAC引起的眼部瘙痒明显少于接受奈多罗米治疗的眼睛和接受安慰剂治疗的眼睛(所有P<0.05)。在任何时间点,接受奈多罗米治疗的眼睛与接受安慰剂治疗的眼睛相比均无统计学或临床差异。接受酮替芬治疗的眼睛与接受安慰剂治疗的眼睛在舒适度方面无差异,但在滴入后1、2、5和10分钟时明显比接受奈多罗米治疗的眼睛更舒适(所有P<0.05)。基于舒适度和主观疗效,60%的受试者更喜欢酮替芬,21%更喜欢奈多罗米,19%更喜欢安慰剂。

结论

在该CAC模型中,给药后5分钟和12小时时,酮替芬比奈多罗米更有效且更舒适。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验