Thill Azure Dee Welborn, Holmbeck Grayson N, Bryant Fred B, Nelson Cheryl, Skocic Amra, Uli Nicole
Department of Psychology, North Central College, USA.
J Pers Assess. 2003 Oct;81(2):111-22. doi: 10.1207/S15327752JPA8102_03.
The purpose of this study was to determine whether the structure of children's self-concept, as rated by children themselves on the Self-Perception Profile for Children (SPPC; Harter, 1985), and the structure of children's competence, as rated by their parents on the Rating Scale of Child's Actual Behavior (PRS) and teachers on the Rating Scale of Child's Actual Behavior (TRS; Harter, 1985), are similar across samples of children with and without spina bifida (children were 8 and 9 years of age; n = 68 in each sample). Using confirmatory factor analyses, results revealed that a multidimensional model for the SPPC and the TRS fit the data well for both samples. On the other hand, the model for both mothers' and fathers' PRS ratings did not fit the data for the spina bifida sample. Further tests of factorial invariance conducted on the SPPC and TRS revealed that the spina bifida and able-bodied samples tended to have the same pattern and magnitude of factor loadings for both instruments. There was some invariance, however, in the amount of unique error variance accounted for across samples. These results bolster our confidence in using the SPPC and TRS to compare children with and without spina bifida.
本研究的目的是确定儿童自我概念的结构(由儿童自己根据儿童自我认知量表(SPPC;哈特,1985年)进行评分)与儿童能力的结构(由其父母根据儿童实际行为评定量表(PRS)以及教师根据儿童实际行为评定量表(TRS;哈特,1985年)进行评分)在患有和未患有脊柱裂的儿童样本中是否相似(儿童年龄为8岁和9岁;每个样本n = 68)。使用验证性因素分析,结果显示SPPC和TRS的多维模型对两个样本的数据拟合良好。另一方面,母亲和父亲的PRS评分模型不适合脊柱裂样本的数据。对SPPC和TRS进行的因素不变性的进一步测试表明,脊柱裂样本和健全样本在这两种工具上往往具有相同的因素负荷模式和大小。然而,不同样本中独特误差方差的占比存在一定的不变性。这些结果增强了我们使用SPPC和TRS来比较患有和未患有脊柱裂儿童的信心。