Moore Brian C J, Moore Geoffrey A
Department of Experimental Psychology, University of Cambridge, Downing Street, Cambridge CB2 3EB, UK.
Hear Res. 2003 Aug;182(1-2):153-63. doi: 10.1016/s0378-5955(03)00191-6.
Difference limens for the fundamental frequency (F0) of complex tones (DLCs) were measured for four normally hearing subjects and three subjects with cochlear hearing loss. The nominal F0 was 100, 200 or 400 Hz. The two tones to be compared contained either low resolved harmonics (RES), harmonics with intermediate resolvability (INT) or high unresolved harmonics (UNRES). For one set of stimuli (fixed harmonics, FH), the tones to be compared contained three harmonics of fixed number, so the changes in F0 were associated with spectral cues. For a second set of stimuli (Shaped), spectral cues were minimized by filtering stimuli through a fixed passband. For the INT and UNRES conditions, the excitation patterns evoked by the Shaped stimuli hardly changed when F0 was altered. To prevent subjects from comparing the frequencies of individual harmonics in the RES condition, subjects were required to detect F0 differences between two tones with non-overlapping harmonics. It was not possible to obtain repeatable results for the hearing-impaired subjects in this condition. The normally hearing subjects had smaller DLCs for the FH than for the Shaped stimuli for the RES condition, and the UNRES condition at the two higher F0s. However, DLCs were similar for the FH and Shaped stimuli for the INT condition and the UNRES condition at the 100-Hz F0, suggesting that spectral cues were not used in these conditions. Except for one subject with F0=400 Hz, the hearing-impaired subjects had smaller DLCs for the FH than for the Shaped stimuli, for both INT and UNRES conditions (although the difference was small for F0=200 Hz in the UNRES condition), suggesting that they used spectral cues for the FH stimuli. For the Shaped stimuli, DLCs were similar in the INT and UNRES conditions for the hearing-impaired subjects, but were smaller in the INT than the RES condition for the normally hearing subjects. We suggest that, in the INT condition with Shaped stimuli, normally hearing subjects used temporal fine structure cues to perform the task. The hearing-impaired subjects appeared to use only temporal envelope cues.
测量了4名听力正常的受试者和3名耳蜗性听力损失受试者对复合音(DLC)基频(F0)的差别阈限。标称F0为100、200或400Hz。要比较的两个音调包含低分辨谐波(RES)、中等分辨能力谐波(INT)或高未分辨谐波(UNRES)。对于一组刺激(固定谐波,FH),要比较的音调包含固定数量的三个谐波,因此F0的变化与频谱线索相关。对于第二组刺激(成形),通过固定通带对刺激进行滤波,使频谱线索最小化。在INT和UNRES条件下,当F0改变时,成形刺激诱发的兴奋模式几乎没有变化。为了防止受试者在RES条件下比较各个谐波的频率,要求受试者检测两个具有非重叠谐波的音调之间的F0差异。在这种情况下,无法获得听力受损受试者的可重复结果。在RES条件下以及两个较高F0的UNRES条件下,听力正常的受试者对FH的DLC比对成形刺激的DLC小。然而,在INT条件下以及100Hz F0的UNRES条件下,FH和成形刺激的DLC相似,这表明在这些条件下未使用频谱线索。除了一名F0 = 400Hz的受试者外,对于INT和UNRES条件,听力受损受试者对FH的DLC比对成形刺激的DLC小(尽管在UNRES条件下F0 = 200Hz时差异很小),这表明他们对FH刺激使用了频谱线索。对于成形刺激,听力受损受试者在INT和UNRES条件下的DLC相似,但听力正常的受试者在INT条件下的DLC比RES条件下小。我们认为,在使用成形刺激的INT条件下,听力正常的受试者使用时间精细结构线索来完成任务。听力受损受试者似乎仅使用时间包络线索。