Armelagos G J, Leatherman T, Ryan M, Sibley L
Department of Anthropology, University of Florida, Gainesville 32611.
Med Anthropol. 1992 Mar;14(1):35-52. doi: 10.1080/01459740.1992.9966065.
Medical anthropology has developed distinct and separate biological and cultural approaches to the study of health and disease in human populations. Within cultural anthropology a major focus has been the ethnomedical perspective that analyzes the process of defining disease and describing the social response to disease. In biological anthropology, an ecological perspective considers the interaction of the population, the insult and the environment at the core of the disease process. There has been limited success in integrating the cultural and biological perspective. Some cultural anthropologists claim that the ecological perspective relies on a biomedical model and therefore is not useful in studying non-Western societies. Others are critical of the adaptivist perspective that they believe fails to consider political economic factors that affect the disease process. The lack of a biocultural integration has hindered the systematic analysis of health and disease in contemporary traditional and non-Western groups. An ecological model that addresses these problems will provide a biocultural integration of the disease process.
医学人类学已经形成了独特且相互独立的生物学和文化学方法,用于研究人类群体中的健康与疾病。在文化人类学领域,一个主要关注点是民族医学视角,该视角分析疾病定义过程以及描述对疾病的社会反应。在生物人类学中,一种生态学视角将人群、致病因素与环境之间的相互作用视为疾病过程的核心。在整合文化学与生物学视角方面取得的成效有限。一些文化人类学家声称,生态学视角依赖生物医学模式,因此在研究非西方社会时并无用处。另一些人则批评适应性视角,认为其未能考虑影响疾病过程的政治经济因素。缺乏生物文化整合阻碍了对当代传统群体和非西方群体中健康与疾病的系统分析。一个能解决这些问题的生态学模型将实现疾病过程的生物文化整合。