Puelles Luis, Rubenstein John L R
Department of Human Anatomy and Psychobiology, Faculty of Medicine, University of Murcia, Murcia 30100, Spain.
Trends Neurosci. 2003 Sep;26(9):469-76. doi: 10.1016/S0166-2236(03)00234-0.
The prosomeric model attributes morphological meaning to gene expression patterns and other data in the forebrain. It divides this territory into the same transverse segments (prosomeres) and longitudinal zones in all vertebrates. The axis and longitudinal zones of this model are widely accepted but controversy subsists about the number of prosomeres and their nature as segments. We describe difficulties encountered in establishing continuity between prosomeric limits postulated in the hypothalamus and intra-telencephalic limits. Such difficulties throw doubt on the intersegmental nature of these limits. We sketch a simplified model, in which the secondary prosencephalon (telencephalon plus hypothalamus) is a complex protosegment not subdivided into prosomeres, which exhibits patterning singularities. By contrast, we continue to postulate that prosomeres p1-p3 (i.e. the pretectum, thalamus and prethalamus) are the caudal forebrain.
前脑模式模型将形态学意义归因于前脑的基因表达模式及其他数据。在所有脊椎动物中,它将该区域划分为相同的横向节段(前脑节)和纵向区域。该模型的轴和纵向区域已被广泛接受,但关于前脑节的数量及其作为节段的性质仍存在争议。我们描述了在下丘脑假定的前脑节界限与端脑内界限之间建立连续性时遇到的困难。这些困难使人对这些界限的节段间性质产生怀疑。我们勾勒了一个简化模型,其中次级前脑(端脑加下丘脑)是一个未细分为前脑节的复杂原节段,具有模式特异性。相比之下,我们继续假定前脑节p1 - p3(即顶盖前区、丘脑和丘脑前区)是尾侧前脑。