在1型糖尿病合并胃轻瘫患者中,加速胃排空并不能改善血糖控制。一项以西沙必利作为模型药物的初步研究。
Glucose control is not improved by accelerating gastric emptying in patients with type 1 diabetes mellitus and gastroparesis. a pilot study with cisapride as a model drug.
作者信息
Lehmann R, Honegger R A, Feinle C, Fried M, Spinas G A, Schwizer W
机构信息
Division of Endocrinology and Diabetes, Department of Internal Medicine, University Hospital, Zurich, Switzerland.
出版信息
Exp Clin Endocrinol Diabetes. 2003 Aug;111(5):255-61. doi: 10.1055/s-2003-41283.
The present pilot study investigated whether acceleration of gastric emptying in patients with type 1 diabetes and delayed gastric emptying (a possible cause of poorly controlled diabetes) improves long-term glucose control. Eight outpatients with diabetes (age 28-63 years, mean diabetes duration 24.6+/-6.0 years) and delayed gastric emptying of radio-opaque markers were randomised and treated, for three months each, with a prokinetic drug (cisapride 20 mg twice daily) and placebo. Mean capillary glucose, glucose variability (M-values, MAGE), fructosamine, and HbA1c were assessed. Gastric emptying of a solid standard meal was measured by scintigraphy after each treatment period. Chronic administration of a prokinetic drug resulted in improved solid gastric emptying (percentage residual) at 120 min (p=0.025). The percentage residual was 43.6+/-9.6 % during prokinetic treatment and 59.7+/-9.9 % during placebo (standard error of paired differences 5.7 %). The mean gastric emptying time (t/2) of solids was 88 min during prokinetic treatment compared to 113 min in the placebo arm (SE of paired differences 14 min; p=0.09). Mean blood glucose values (9.0+/-3.8 vs. 8.8+/-3.7 mmol/l), daily glucose variability (MAGE 6.8+/-1.3 vs. 6.3+/-1.6 mmol/l; M-value 15.2+/-2.5 vs. 13.9+/-4.5), and HbA1c at 3 months (7.8+/-1.1 % vs. 7.6+/-1.0 %) were not statistically different between prokinetic drug and placebo treatment. Similarly, the frequency of hypoglycaemic episodes (< or = 3 mmol/l) was not different in both groups (78 vs. 68). Our pilot study showed that long-term acceleration of gastric emptying had no effect on overall glycaemic control, the magnitude of glucose excursions, and hypoglycaemic episodes in patients with diabetic gastroparesis. We do not recommend, therefore, acceleration of gastric emptying as treatment strategy for "brittle diabetes" in patients with type 1 diabetes.
本初步研究调查了1型糖尿病伴胃排空延迟(糖尿病控制不佳的一个可能原因)患者的胃排空加速是否能改善长期血糖控制。8例糖尿病门诊患者(年龄28 - 63岁,平均糖尿病病程24.6±6.0年)且放射性不透光标志物胃排空延迟,被随机分组,分别接受促动力药物(西沙必利20 mg,每日2次)和安慰剂治疗,各为期3个月。评估了平均毛细血管血糖、血糖变异性(M值、平均血糖波动幅度)、果糖胺和糖化血红蛋白。在每个治疗期后,通过闪烁扫描法测量固体标准餐的胃排空情况。长期服用促动力药物使120分钟时固体胃排空(残留百分比)得到改善(p = 0.025)。促动力治疗期间残留百分比为43.6±9.6%,安慰剂治疗期间为59.7±9.9%(配对差异标准误5.7%)。促动力治疗期间固体的平均胃排空时间(t/2)为88分钟,而安慰剂组为113分钟(配对差异标准误14分钟;p = 0.09)。促动力药物治疗与安慰剂治疗之间,平均血糖值(9.0±3.8对8.8±3.7 mmol/L)、每日血糖变异性(平均血糖波动幅度6.8±1.3对6.3±1.6 mmol/L;M值15.2±2.5对13.9±4.5)以及3个月时的糖化血红蛋白(7.8±1.1%对7.6±1.0%)在统计学上无差异。同样,两组低血糖发作频率(≤3 mmol/L)也无差异(78次对68次)。我们的初步研究表明,胃排空长期加速对糖尿病胃轻瘫患者的总体血糖控制、血糖波动幅度和低血糖发作无影响。因此,我们不建议将加速胃排空作为1型糖尿病“脆性糖尿病”的治疗策略。