Suppr超能文献

在医生办公室和门诊手术中心进行的手术的比较结果分析。

Comparative outcomes analysis of procedures performed in physician offices and ambulatory surgery centers.

作者信息

Vila Hector, Soto Roy, Cantor Alan B, Mackey David

机构信息

Department of Anesthesiology, H. Lee Moffitt Cancer Center and Research Institute, Tampa, FL 33612, USA.

出版信息

Arch Surg. 2003 Sep;138(9):991-5. doi: 10.1001/archsurg.138.9.991.

Abstract

HYPOTHESIS

This study compared outcomes to determine whether patient safety is similar in Florida ambulatory surgery centers and offices.

DATA SOURCES

All adverse incident reports to the Florida Board of Medicine for procedure dates April 1, 2000, to April 1, 2002 were reviewed. The numbers of office procedures performed during a 4-month period were used to estimate the total number of procedures. Ambulatory surgery death summaries, adverse incident data, and volumes of procedures for 2000 were procured from the Florida Agency for Health Care Administration.

STUDY SELECTION/DATA EXTRACTION: Adverse incident reports were reviewed by multiple parties; only reports that involved an office surgical procedure and resulted in injury or death were included in the outcomes calculation. Reports were extracted independently by multiple reviewers.

DATA SYNTHESIS

Adverse incidents occurred at a rate of 66 and 5.3 per 100,00 procedures in offices and ambulatory surgery centers, respectively. The death rate per 100,000 procedures performed was 9.2 in offices and 0.78 in ambulatory surgery centers. The relative risks for injuries and deaths for office procedures vs ambulatory surgery centers were 12.4 (95% confidence interval, 9.5-16.2) and 11.8 (95% confidence interval, 5.8-24.1), respectively.

CONCLUSIONS

In this review of surgical procedures performed in offices and ambulatory surgery centers in Florida during a recent 2-year period, there was an approximately 10-fold increased risk of adverse incidents and death in the office setting. If all office procedures had been performed in ambulatory surgery centers, approximately 43 injuries and 6 deaths per year could have been prevented.

摘要

假设

本研究比较了相关结果,以确定佛罗里达州门诊手术中心和诊所的患者安全情况是否相似。

数据来源

对2000年4月1日至2002年4月1日期间向佛罗里达州医学委员会提交的所有不良事件报告进行了审查。用4个月期间诊所手术的数量来估算手术总数。2000年的门诊手术死亡总结、不良事件数据以及手术量数据均来自佛罗里达州医疗保健管理局。

研究选择/数据提取:多方对不良事件报告进行了审查;只有涉及诊所外科手术且导致受伤或死亡的报告才被纳入结果计算。报告由多名审查人员独立提取。

数据综合

诊所和门诊手术中心每100,000例手术的不良事件发生率分别为66例和5.3例。每100,000例手术的死亡率在诊所为9.2例,在门诊手术中心为0.78例。诊所手术与门诊手术中心相比,受伤和死亡的相对风险分别为12.4(95%置信区间,9.5 - 16.2)和11.8(95%置信区间,5.8 - 24.1)。

结论

在对佛罗里达州近期两年内在诊所和门诊手术中心进行的外科手术的此次审查中,诊所环境下不良事件和死亡风险增加了约10倍。如果所有诊所手术都在门诊手术中心进行,每年大约可预防43例受伤和6例死亡。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验